Information Security Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for information security professionals. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Is password entropy only mean that its long and look/or random, or there is something else, if the password 50 random numbers will it had high entropy or not

share|improve this question
This looks like a duplicate of Password entropy in layman's terms. – D.W. Jun 7 '12 at 18:05
up vote 7 down vote accepted

The entropy of a password is defined as the base 2 logarithm of the number of guesses an attacker would have to make in order to be sure of correctly guessing your password.

It's an idea from the science of information theory, and in the information security field it is normally used as a measurement of how resistant a password is to a "brute force attack", which is where an attacker tries every possible password one after another.

If a brute force attack is possible it always works eventually. The catch is in the word "eventually". If an attacker can brute force a password in 20 seconds, then it's not very good. If it takes them two weeks, it's better. If it takes two years, most attackers won't bother.

A password with higher entropy will, on average, take longer to brute force.

You can increase the entropy of a password by either

  1. increasing the length
  2. having a wider range of possible characters (e.g. use upper and lower case and punctuation as well as numbers)
  3. doing both

A 50 digit numeric password has an entropy of about 166. That would be considered very high indeed. I personally use passwords with entropy of around 100, which is pretty high. That is about the same entropy as a 32 digit numeric password.

You can't say how high an entropy is "high enough" without knowing more about the specific system the password is associated with - it depends on how fast the attacker can make guesses.

Let us suppose you use the password to protect a 7zip encrypted file, and your attacker is well resourced and uses a Cray XE6 supercomputer that can do 55 trillion guesses a second. If you're a 12 year old white US male, you have 63 years remaining life expectancy. Some simple math lets us work out that you need an entropy of about 77.5 for a password the Cray will not, on average, break in your lifetime.

If you use a numeric password, then, it will have to be at least 24 digits long (e.g 687374947891238403277394); or if you use mixed case alphanumeric with punctuation, it will have to be at least 12 characters long. (e.g. !cV~#$Liit4F).

It is important to remember, though, that brute force attacks are not the only way to break a password, and that entropy alone does note determine if a password is good or bad.

share|improve this answer
is that mean that i can use only numeric passwords if it more than 32 – rezx Jun 7 '12 at 16:02
We can't tell without knowing what the password is for. Your ATM card has a 4 digit PIN, and that's fine, because an attacker can only make a few guesses, so a very small entropy is high enough. – Graham Hill Jun 7 '12 at 16:09
Ah, are you asking "how much longer does a numeric password need to be until it is as strong as an alphabetic password?" – Graham Hill Jun 7 '12 at 16:10
i'll use it for truecrypt and 7z files, without any keyfiles. so how much longer does a numeric password need strong as ... – rezx Jun 7 '12 at 16:11
@rezx Updated my answer to use this as the example. – Graham Hill Jun 8 '12 at 8:10

One possible way to think of entropy is the number of different passwords of the same length as yours. So if your password is "1234", you can calculate the number of "possible" 4-digit passwords that contain only digits:


We use 10, because there are 10 options for the digits. In general

{Number of options} ^ {Size of the password}

So if the site you are using expects alphanumeric passwords, and you use a 50 digit password, you have:

entropy = 36^50 = 6.53318624 × 10^77

So yeah. It's more than strong enough.

share|improve this answer
strong enough for what? Any strength has to be considered against the use - it might be strong enough in some situations, but not others. – Rory Alsop Jun 8 '12 at 8:44

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.