Take the 2-minute tour ×
Information Security Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for Information security professionals. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Background:

  • Fabrication of data is a high security concern
  • Interception of (most) data is a low security concern
  • Destruction of data is a medium security concern (everything is backed up, but production would be crippled for hours)

Question:

I just came into a new IT position. Currently our WAP is setup with the WPA protocol and a MAC access list.

Personally I think with 60 end users and over 100 wireless devices that constantly grows and changes, managing the mac address list is ridiculous, especially since it is being duplicated over 3 WAPs manually.

Even if a malicious user got on our network, the damage they could do is somewhat controlled through group policy. The building is so big, it's just as likely someone unauthorized will just sit at a terminal and try to break stuff, I've made most users have very limited access to company data so that should be minimized.

I would like to take the approach of just not giving anyone the key since WPA encrypts the key on the users system anyway. It seems like the WPA key being secret is secure enough for wifi, am I just misinformed and is my way acceptable for my security conditions? It seems like having physically unsecured computers is just as dangerous. I'de rather not worry about wifi when it has a key on it whereas my 100s of ethernet outlets do not.

share|improve this question

2 Answers 2

up vote 4 down vote accepted

As MAC addresses can be spoofed (and are sent unencrypted), access lists based on them are ineffective. I agree that your time is better spent elsewhere. Also, WPA-PSK (aka WPA Personal, which is what I am assuming you are set up with) is in my opinion insufficient for businesses of your size. A single shared secret does not keep secret, especially when it can be brute-forced offline. You therefor may wish to invest the time you would have used maintaining your access list into setting up IEEE WPA-802.1X (aka WPA Enterprise)

share|improve this answer
    
K i think I'll go with that –  justausr Jul 12 '12 at 20:20
    
+1 for WPA-Enterprise / 802.1X. But while you're at it, you really should be using WPA2, not just WPA. –  fennec Aug 16 '12 at 19:56

Windows stores all keys as plain-text (click on connection->view password). For a company your size you need something like a radius server, and using certificates to authenticate users.

share|improve this answer
    
Even Windows 7 and 8 store in plain-text? I thought Microsoft had come up with some kind of king ring by now. Also, good advice. –  chao-mu Jul 12 '12 at 20:23

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.