Information Security Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for information security professionals. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

In current years we have used WPA and WPA 2 for the encryption of data sent over an 802.11 network. But in the past WEP is used . From time to time, many people say that WEP (Wired Equivalent Privacy) is a rather poor way of protecting data sent over an 802.11 wireless network. Is there any reason behind? What is the advantage of using WPA for the encryption of data sent over an 802.11 network ?

share|improve this question
In short: Methods currently exist which allow WEP to be broken within a matter of minutes, if not seconds. Check out the Wiki article. – Iszi Oct 12 '12 at 17:40
I've heard people suggest that NetworkManager should add a plugin to crack WEP, since it's faster than waiting for a user to type the password. – Brendan Long Oct 12 '12 at 19:44
WEP ceased to be considered security a long time ago and doesn't protect data at all. – Fiasco Labs Oct 13 '12 at 6:38
up vote 6 down vote accepted

WEP has a flaw that renders it essentially unsecure. If you look at How wep wireless security works? it explains in better detail.

WPA(2) has fixed that vulnerability but they also suffer from their own problems.

share|improve this answer

As mentioned in the conclusion of this article the password may be your weakest point.

However, if you have a "secure" password you should be good to go.

But yes, WEP is full of flaws.

WPA also has some problems.

Use WP2 and make sure to disable WPS!

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.