Take the 2-minute tour ×
Information Security Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for Information security professionals. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I'm trying to brush up on the more process-orientated and policy-orientated side of security, and am interested in incident response. I understand that most security-competent businesses have some kind of basic security incident response process that governs how they deal with security incidents within their corporate network.

What elements need to be considered as part of a standard incident response process? Are there any specific areas that should be focused on, such as forensic integrity of evidence? Is this the sort of thing that varies wildly depending on the organisation and incident types, or are there a lot of common elements?

share|improve this question
add comment

2 Answers

up vote 7 down vote accepted

A basic set of processes should include the following high level categories:

  • Threat analysis - this should include all types of threats; natural disasters, terrorist attack, foreign espionage etc and should be reviewed annually to understand and prepare for likely incidents. These threats should be mapped to incidents and these mappings should feed into the development of incident response procedures. This is the key preparatory stage.

  • Classification of incidents - classification should be owned centrally, and should be the responsibility of the business. This classification should include impact and likelihood thresholds, along with escalation requirements. This will help determine how incidents are responded to, with what urgency, and with what sort of resolution expectations.

  • Operational procedures - communication and escalation procedures should be formalised and documented for each business unit. These need to include named individuals or teams, service levels, response times, and communication protocols within and outside the team and organisation. The teams involved will depend on classification of the incident, but each team will require operational procedures to meet standard requirements for communication, measurement, integrity and resilience.

  • Post incident review - post incident review should be formalised and mandatory for all incidents. This should include a complete impact assessment to help the organisation understand the incremental, long term and intangible costs of the incident.

  • Final closeout - closeout should include recording of incident resolution time and activities, as well as the comparison with the expected outcome so that improvement can be made.

I think, from the wording of the question, that you are most interested in the Operational Procedures section, so I'll drop down a level here:

Operational Procedures will include items like:

  • Retention of all information recorded by the incident team from the beginning of the incident to at least the closeout. Beyond that time, retention will be according to corporate or regulatory requirements.
  • Putting a hold on all log rotation - instead of following the normal log rotation cycle, logs dating back a defined amount (this may be an hour, a day or longer) will be made available to the investigation team.
  • As any incident could be a criminal incident, no matter what it first looks like (As an example, tectonic exfiltration - opportunistic theft of hardware occurred during the chaos caused by the earthquakes in New Zealand) the recording of data should be as complete as possible, and recorded to storage that is Write-Once, Read-Many if possible, and forensic rules should apply.
  • Identification of activities to rapidly remediate and get back to Business-as-Usual, as well as activities to fully investigate the root cause of the incident.
  • Internal and External incidents may be dealt with very differently (for example an employee who has stolen critical data may just be fired and walked off the site, but evidence that a competitor has been carrying out industrial espionage may be passed to the police, or may be quietly hidden - these decisions will have business outcomes so need to be discussed at the level of the Chief Risk Officer or equivalent)

Remember that every item or activity is a cost option, so we very rarely see all of these carried out. The first to go is usually the forensic recording of data or activities, as a business suffering a major incident may be losing money every minute the incident continues. The driver is likely to be getting back up to normal operating procedures first, followed by an investigation after the fact.

For a couple of specifics on Computer Security Incident Response, check out this IETF document and this CERT document.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Answer for your question is not simple, I suggest to depend on SO/IEC TR 18044:2004 and other best practice, personally, I created some categories for classifying the risk level (Critical, High, Medium, Low) and also I identified most expected events, expected events can be easily defined, for example:

  • All events that matches security principles (Confidential, integrity, availability) you can extend to more specific like (authenticity, accountability, Non-Repudiation, etc).
  • Then classify them according to internal and external (if the attacker is an employee or anonymouse)

Now for each event create location (Targets) for each event, it will be logical or real locations, after this, provide detail to your plan.

Finally, get support form top management for your project!!!

[1] http://blog.iso27001standard.com/tag/incident-response/

[2] http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=35396

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.