Tell me more ×
IT Security Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for IT security professionals. It's 100% free, no registration required.

This week we have NIST’s vulnerabilities database offline due to being hacked and Microsoft patching a USB physical attack that takes over every version to date with just an insertion of a thumb drive. From my point of view the these two events are the endpoint on a trend line suggesting system attacks against current architectures are far from being tamed by rigorous use of contemporary defensive measures.

Given that assumption, what changes in our plans, processes, and designs, if any, should be make if it becomes a much more common event to “Nuke it from orbit”? NIST has been down for a week which suggests one of the premiere authors of such guides for best practices may have been caught flat footed.

I am looking for more detailed answers than “Do regular backups”. Obviously NIST did regular backups and had a recovery process in place but still they are stymied. I can guess at the challenges NIST is facing. I would like suggestions for best practices in a world where getting owned is a common event for internet facing or physical USB port accessible systems.

share|improve this question
I think this is simply way too broad to get an actual "answer." While my general thought is, "Mandatory Access Control," I can imagine lots more to it. SQL injection still persists, etc. I think you might do better flushing this out in our chat room to something that's more narrow / concrete. – Jeff Ferland Mar 14 at 13:14
Actaully I thought the answer lived in the cloud and a multitude of working images (enough to get to a known good once the bad was understood). The question was about recovery in a new dangerous world but I understand the justification for closure and will attempt to avoid similar questions as this site is not appropiate for those questions. Sorry for the trouble... – zedman9991 Mar 14 at 17:20

closed as not constructive by Jeff Ferland Mar 14 at 13:05

As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or specific expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, see the FAQ for guidance.