Information Security Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for information security professionals. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top


Which one would be better, if we look it @security side?
I heard that RDP is very very poor when it comes to security.

share|improve this question
up vote 4 down vote accepted

RDP has some issues, but these are broadly mitigated by getting the config right. Wicked Clown demonstrated a wonderful privilege escalation attack from restricted user to admin in less than 5 minutes at the recent B Sides London security conference which relied on a common misconfiguration - paper here. TLS can provide a strongly authenticated tunnel - which will help.

An alternative could be VNC - which also has potential issues, however using an SSH tunnel for this gives you a much better position with respect to security as you can use strong mutual authentication.

The key point to look at is what your key risks are - if you are worried about an attacker pretending to be a user, SSH or TLS with certificates gives you the authentication and encrypted tunnel part of the puzzle, is a good idea, however you still have the risk of an attacker stealing the mobile device:-)

share|improve this answer
so ssh tunnel+rdp... :( :\ – LanceBaynes May 10 '11 at 16:56
or rdp+TLS .... – Rory Alsop May 10 '11 at 17:17
I don't trust RDP even if it would have a TLS feature. – LanceBaynes May 10 '11 at 17:33
@LanceBaynes can you provide a reason for not trusting RDP even with TLS? – Steve May 10 '11 at 19:45
I wanted to mean: RDP vs. OpenSSHD .... I think we don't need to compare the two on security side – LanceBaynes May 10 '11 at 19:54

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.