Take the 2-minute tour ×
Information Security Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for Information security professionals. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I understand that FIPS addresses cryptographic operations.
My question is, is it addressing exactly this?
For example, can an application loading a keystore use a non-FIPS provider?

Any input or relevant references is appreciated

share|improve this question

2 Answers 2

up vote 2 down vote accepted

The Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS) is a series of publications specifying a wide range of standards, ranging from specs for smart cards (PIV) to algorithm specifications, testing requirements and even geographical place names. While in many cases, US federal agencies are required to adhere to the standards, they are not generally mandatory for commercial use.

Depending on which standards you're talking about, and what level of compliance you may be required to meet, the answers will vary.

share|improve this answer

For example an application loading a keystore using a non-FIPS provider, is it something forbidden or am I confused on this?

I think the definition of FIPS might help: Federal Information Processing Standard. The key here is Standard, much like a W3C technical report, ISO standard etc. You are not under any obligation to conform to these standards. Just look at web browsers. You are more than welcome to do your own thing. It isn't necessarily wrong not to conform to these standards.

But, there is always a reason for these standards. For one, conforming to them means you ought to be able to interoperate with other conforming software. For example, take C99, the ISO C standard. Any C99 code I write ought to work on any C99-compliant compiler.

In the case of cryptography and information security, I would really advise following these standards. For starters, they define how an algorithm or key store should behave, meaning not only interoperability but usually a reasonable level of security testing too. In other words, you know your environment (that you've just implemented) ought to not contain any weaknesses, library, OS and environment issues non-withstanding.

As an end user, you know your FIPS-compliant key store should give you some assurance of security, as opposed to whatever storage format Joe Bloggs dreamed up. You should find your software has some level of interoperability (for example, different standard, but many programs can read PKCS#11 keys and OpenPGP keys).

So it isn't forbidden per se, just really highly recommended. If you're choosing software, I would favour something that follows FIPS, PKCS or OpenPGP.

Another point to mention here is that FIPS, RFCs etc often define a usable part of what's out there (by way of a standard). Rijndael != AES, for example. The Rijndael cipher supports many more key lengths and block sizes than AES does, but simplifying that to a certain subset means it is simpler to implement, and that is exactly what AES (FIPS 197) does. What would happen if you said "implement Rijndael" is that many developers would not implement certain sizes due to time constraints, pure laziness or whatever. Software using the exact same core algorithm would then otherwise be incompatible.

So as a final answer, no it isn't forbidden, but it is highly recommended. Mostly, it is about interoperability, but there will be some level of assurance ("we're not recommending a broken cipher" (in current FIPS as opposed to retired ones)) too.

share|improve this answer
    
@Ninefingers:Thanks for the answer.But for example, if a keystore is a pfx, does it matter if the provider used to load it is non-FIPS compliant?I imagine if the keystore was created by a FIPS compliant provider, it should be ok if it is just loaded by a non-FIPS provider.Or am I wrong on this? –  Jim Jun 1 '11 at 21:26
    
@Jim pfx keystores are defined by PKCS#11, which isn't FIPS, so providing the provider complies with PKCS#11 (from RSA laboratories) you should be able to open the pfx. However, it depends on what the provider is going to do with those keys. If you require a FIPS operation with that key and the provider does not implement it, it will not work. –  user2213 Jun 1 '11 at 21:52
    
You mean PKCS12?Also how do you know they are not FIPS?I mean where can I find these details myself to read? –  Jim Jun 2 '11 at 5:18
    
@Jim yes I do, PKCS#11 refers to smartcard storage, sorry!! Because they're by RSA Laboratories: rsa.com/rsalabs/node.asp?id=2138 although parts of the standard may be incorporated into a FIPS standard. If just PKCS#12 is the mimimum requirement, then you're ok. If you need any FIPS bits, then you're not. –  user2213 Jun 2 '11 at 7:44
1  
@Jim which FIPS? There are many different FIPS standards. AES (FIPS 197) does not require PKCS12. Other FIPS standards might, I don't know. –  user2213 Jun 2 '11 at 14:19

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.