I own a url shortening service. I want to deliver only legitimate statistics to my clients. There are possible scenarios that a particular user writes a script to automatically open the shortened URL, thus making the statistics look bad. What are the approaches one can follow to detect if a click is legitimate or not? The very basic approach that I can think of is to monitor the IP address of the user and block if the number of requests exceed a threshold.
Owen's answer above reminded me of something very low tech but simple and effective that I've tried. To get an idea of how badly bots are skewing my click stats, -- right next to my affiliate banner graphic -- I have a single-pixel, transparent gif that's also wrapped in an href tag. I think it's safe to assume that only bots would be clicking that invisible link so I just compare the number of clicks for the affiliate banner vs. the transparent, 1-pixel gif link.
A little method I've just come up with thinking about this (and it's probably been done before):
When a link is clicked with a mouse, it generates an event, and that even has a property
If a link is clicked using an ECMAScript trigger of the click event, the
If you interrupt a click event and check whether
This is a very basic idea, and I haven't honed it down or tested it well, but maybe it will be of use to you. I've created a rough CodePen demo highlighting the functionality, with a simple version of the code that it might run.
I haven't checked it on a touch device, and you may well find that Touch events do not return these properties either, meaning you may need to find an alternative property to check for on touch devices, if this were to work effectively.
In terms of blue sky thinking, it's not too bad though, and it may help you form a more cogent approach to avoiding clickjacking.
There's a number of potential methods you can use to differentiate bots from humans but none of them are likely 100%
Obviously as you say rate limiting catches the really stupid bots who don't know to click at human speed. You could say one click per IP but that will artificially deflate your stats in the case of humans behind a proxy (becoming more common as IPv4 addresses run out)
IP blocking isn't too useful in the days of cloud computing, it's pretty easy for an attacker to get a different IP or range of IPs to work from if they're dedicated enough.
As @fas says you can try user agent, but again that'll only catch bots who don't know how to set a user-agent which isn't really too difficult to do.
You could introduce some "computer hard" task into the clicking process but that would make your site pretty user unfriendly (e.g. CAPTCHA's). Again not 100% but harder to overcome trivially.
Ultimately I'd suggest it depends on how motivated/well funded your attackers are. If they are reasonably motivated and have some cash they can just hire real people to click the link (e.g. via amazon mechanical turk), at which point you're likely going to find it tricky to differentiate legitimate traffic from non-legitimate traffic.
Assuming your attackers are more casual about it, I'd say combine User Agent and source IP address. User Agents can actually be relatively identifying (more info on the panopticlick site ). So if you limit each user agent to one click per source IP address you may get a decent approximation, against an relatively unsophisticated attacker.
Try checking for valid user agents and referers. User Agents can always be spoofed but that's your best bet. Even if a bot is clicking through though, I'd consider that traffic.