**Domain Name System Security Extensions (DNSSEC)** is a set of IETF specifications for digitally signed DNS.

learn more… | top users | synonyms

21
votes
2answers
2k views

If DNSSEC is so questionable, why is it ahead of DNSCurve in adoption?

Looking at all the people who question the viability of DNSSEC, it's no wonder that the adoption rates are so poor. However, what about DNSCurve? It supposedly fixes all the DNS security and privacy ...
10
votes
2answers
16k views

DNS zone transfer attack

Hello Guys! Can anyone explain what is DNS zone transfer or give any link, paper? I have already googled, but could not find anything meaningful?
11
votes
2answers
3k views

How does DNSSec work? Are there known limitations or issues?

Based on information from this site, DNSSec is needed to protect us from a number of DNS and SSL / TLS hacks, including: DNS spoofing, especially on wifi or shared medium Registrars that abuse their ...
2
votes
1answer
55 views

When using https but not DNSSEC, under what situation, a client is vulnerable?

So DNSSEC is to ensure that returned IP address is not poisoned. And https is to verify the remote server. My question is that when protected by https, under what circumstances, a client is ...
2
votes
1answer
2k views

How can I tell if a DNSSec zone is protected using NSEC3 (versus NSEC)

This answer describes how DNSSec might permit "Zone walking"... where a bad guy can extract all the DNS records from a DNSSec enabled zone. NSEC3 is an update that prevents this. (See bottom of this ...
13
votes
4answers
4k views

DNSSec (Comcast) vs DNSCurve (OpenDNS)

I was previously using OpenDNS on my internal network. I found out today that Comcast has switched over to DNSSec: Comcast DNSSec. I've done a little research on DNSSec and its benefits. I ...
15
votes
2answers
1k views

If DNSSEC is so useful, why is its deployment non-existent for top domains?

I've read several papers on DNSSEC, and it appears that it does prevent many attack classes, and the only two possible downsides is that its deployment is hard (DNSSEC is complex), and that you can ...
10
votes
3answers
467 views

Why is RFC4255 (SSHFP) not used for https?

I had this idea a few hours ago, but of course it already exists and there is even an RFC... Why don't we publish the fingerprint for the SSL/TLS certificate via DNS? We need DNSSEC to make sure the ...
1
vote
0answers
60 views

Does DNSSEC provide signed statements that a certain domain does NOT yet support DNSSEC? If not, why not?

In my security class with David Wagner, we talked about some of the reasons why DNSSEC is not widely adopted right now. One of the reasons was that for backward compatibility reasons, clients need to ...
0
votes
3answers
152 views

What organisation(s) is able to recommend a baseline technology set for safe, secure, web browsing?

This is a high level question regarding some recent posts about enhancing web browser security from an end-user perspective. What business/organisation(s) would have: Sufficient technical skill ...