Tag Info

New answers tagged

2

Ichilov's answer is more relevant. Two non-vulnerable SSL Attacks Send garbage data in place of pre-master secret (SSL Handshake flood) Continuously re-negotiate the per-master secret from the handshake again & again Hope Ichilov's explination is quite enough Mitigation: Client puzzle can help to mitigate DDoS attacks. The client puzzle mechanism ...


0

It depends upon the vendor, and it may rely upon inference. That is why we use vulnerability scanners, and why vulnerability scanners err on the side of assuming guilt given unclear evidence. Vendor At least one vendor, Red Hat, maintains a vulnerability-to-CVE mapping database, where they list all CVEs that apply to software in their distribution. The ...


0

This is exactly what vulnerability scanners do. They just aren't great at it (none I've ever seen detect ALL unsupported software, and I doubt they will any time soon!). Generally all vendors have their own way of disseminating this information - if they do at all - which is a major pain for asset owners and security specialists. For vulnerabilities ...



Top 50 recent answers are included