157 reputation
6
bio website
location
age
visits member for 9 months
seen May 16 at 21:44
stats profile views 4

Apr
10
awarded  Excavator
Apr
10
revised How does a client authenticate the domain controller
fixed malformed numbered list; spelling/grammar fixes
Apr
10
suggested suggested edit on How does a client authenticate the domain controller
Mar
27
accepted When taking ownership of a TPM in Windows 7, how is the SRK derived from the password?
Mar
17
accepted Is there a reliable way to simulate “Evil Maid Attack” boot path tampering when using bitlocker?
Mar
17
answered Is there a reliable way to simulate “Evil Maid Attack” boot path tampering when using bitlocker?
Mar
17
comment When taking ownership of a TPM in Windows 7, how is the SRK derived from the password?
Thanks for the great answer. I'm not grokking your last paragraph, though. What do you mean by "internal encryption"?
Mar
17
asked When taking ownership of a TPM in Windows 7, how is the SRK derived from the password?
Feb
14
comment Is there a reliable way to simulate “Evil Maid Attack” boot path tampering when using bitlocker?
'performing the attack' would work just as well for my purposes. I've been hunting for an image of the "specially prepared USB drive" apparently used in the article, without success. I'd like to attempt the attack in the article, but without an image that is pretty tough.
Feb
14
comment Is there a reliable way to simulate “Evil Maid Attack” boot path tampering when using bitlocker?
As we established in the question's comments, this doesn't answer my actual question. The paper is on point, and is a decent survey of plausible attack strategies. However, it only confirms what I already understood: Boot path tampering is detectable by the user when using Bitlocker with "PIN + TPM". My original question of how to simulate such boot path tampering for testing, however, remains.
Feb
14
awarded  Commentator
Feb
14
comment Is there a reliable way to simulate “Evil Maid Attack” boot path tampering when using bitlocker?
@BobWatson I think you've found the root of our miscommunication. Thanks for that. Indeed, I am specifically interested in "'Evil Maid Attack' boot path tampering" (à la the question's title) not every possible flavor of 'Evil Maid Attack' of which there are many, as you have commented.
Feb
13
comment Is there a reliable way to simulate “Evil Maid Attack” boot path tampering when using bitlocker?
"You're asking to protect yourself in the case where you're leaving your machine unattended." I didn't ask that. With respect, I'm not really interested in opinions about the likelihood of surreptitious replacement of my motherboard. I'm actually interested in an answer to my original question.
Feb
13
comment Is there a reliable way to simulate “Evil Maid Attack” boot path tampering when using bitlocker?
Thanks @BobWatson. I have seen that argument advanced before. It seems to lump all forms of physical access threats together. In particular, it dismisses the idea of protecting against boot path tampering because a hardware key logger could be installed. Personally, I don't follow that argument: I can disassemble my laptop and fairly confidently rule out the existence of a hardware key logger, so why shouldn't I use a TPM to rule out the existence of a boot-path key logger?
Feb
13
revised Is there a reliable way to simulate “Evil Maid Attack” boot path tampering when using bitlocker?
added 4 characters in body
Feb
13
revised Is there a reliable way to simulate “Evil Maid Attack” boot path tampering when using bitlocker?
added 198 characters in body
Feb
13
asked Is there a reliable way to simulate “Evil Maid Attack” boot path tampering when using bitlocker?
Feb
2
comment VM hypervisior that doesn't leak that it's a VM to the guest?
@TomLeek +1 "mostly because there is no equality between skills at assembly system programming, and capacity to explain things to other people with pedagogy and serenity"
Aug
22
awarded  Supporter
Aug
9
comment How can I determine whether a website somehow protects against brute force attacks on my password? (assume I can't create an anonymous account)
+1 for point about clearing cookies