network profile
| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 4 months |
| seen | Jan 30 at 19:35 | |
| stats | profile views | 4 |
|
Jan 20 |
comment |
Linux kernel 3.2 syscalls so old shellcode will work on my 3.2 kernel if i compile the binary with the -fno-stack-protector and -z execstack flags; just tested it |
|
Jan 20 |
awarded | Scholar |
|
Jan 20 |
accepted | Linux kernel 3.2 syscalls |
|
Jan 20 |
comment |
Linux kernel 3.2 syscalls Thanks a lot! That's what I needed to know , i.e. , if I could still use the old int 0x80 shellcodes evem on newer kernels. Thank you! |
|
Jan 20 |
comment |
Linux kernel 3.2 syscalls Hello! I have and no hint of "int 0x80" there! Also I've grep-ed the whole objdump output for the binary file (compiled with the -static flag) and no hint of SYSENTER or SYSCALL either. |
|
Jan 20 |
awarded | Student |
|
Jan 20 |
asked | Linux kernel 3.2 syscalls |
