263 reputation
111
bio website mikeberggren.com
location California
age 29
visits member for 3 years
seen 2 days ago

Technology Enthusiast, Gamer, Sci-Fi Addict, and DIY-er in training. =)


May
5
asked Is it correct to consider audits as exclusively “detective” in nature?
May
4
awarded  Citizen Patrol
May
4
comment Is it correct to consider Task Based Access Control as a type of RBAC?
I was afraid you'd say that ;-) It makes since but I'm concerned that ambiguous areas like this will become troublesome during the exam since I won't have an essay field to explain why I chose the answer.
May
4
accepted Is it correct to consider Task Based Access Control as a type of RBAC?
May
3
comment Is it correct to consider Task Based Access Control as a type of RBAC?
Ahhhh interesting. Thanks AviD!
May
3
asked Is it correct to consider Task Based Access Control as a type of RBAC?
Apr
22
awarded  Scholar
Apr
22
comment Why does the ★-property rule of the Bell-Lapadula Model allow information to be stored in objects with HIGHER sensitivity labels?
Hi Marcin, this is great example too. Thanks for the additional information. It's quite helpful.
Apr
22
accepted Why does the ★-property rule of the Bell-Lapadula Model allow information to be stored in objects with HIGHER sensitivity labels?
Apr
22
comment Why does the ★-property rule of the Bell-Lapadula Model allow information to be stored in objects with HIGHER sensitivity labels?
Thanks D.W, this is EXACTLY what I was looking for.
Apr
22
comment Why does the ★-property rule of the Bell-Lapadula Model allow information to be stored in objects with HIGHER sensitivity labels?
Thanks for the clarification. I'm not a programmer so perhaps that's where my confusion is coming from.
Apr
22
awarded  Student
Apr
22
comment Why does the ★-property rule of the Bell-Lapadula Model allow information to be stored in objects with HIGHER sensitivity labels?
Hi John, thanks for the prompt response! I see your point and I guess it doesn't hurt for something to be more secure. As for why it shouldn't happen, I guess it just doesn't make sense to me for a subject to not be able to "read" the same place that they're "writing" to. How would they know if they're overwriting something? It also seems like it would dilute the purpose of the object. If I'm storing "confidential" information in an object that's really intended to keep "Top Secret" information, I'm reducing it's effectiveness. Perhaps I'm over-thinking this though.
Apr
22
asked Why does the ★-property rule of the Bell-Lapadula Model allow information to be stored in objects with HIGHER sensitivity labels?
Apr
15
awarded  Quorum
Apr
15
awarded  Supporter