meta user
network profile
| bio | website | mikeberggren.com |
|---|---|---|
| location | California | |
| age | 29 | |
| visits | member for | 2 years, 1 month |
| seen | May 7 at 21:42 | |
| stats | profile views | 9 |
Technology Enthusiast, Gamer, Sci-Fi Addict, and DIY-er in training. =)
|
May 4 |
comment |
Is it correct to consider Task Based Access Control as a type of RBAC? I was afraid you'd say that ;-) It makes since but I'm concerned that ambiguous areas like this will become troublesome during the exam since I won't have an essay field to explain why I chose the answer. |
|
May 4 |
accepted | Is it correct to consider Task Based Access Control as a type of RBAC? |
|
May 3 |
comment |
Is it correct to consider Task Based Access Control as a type of RBAC? Ahhhh interesting. Thanks AviD! |
|
May 3 |
asked | Is it correct to consider Task Based Access Control as a type of RBAC? |
|
Apr 22 |
awarded | Scholar |
|
Apr 22 |
comment |
Why does the ★-property rule of the Bell-Lapadula Model allow information to be stored in objects with HIGHER sensitivity labels? Hi Marcin, this is great example too. Thanks for the additional information. It's quite helpful. |
|
Apr 22 |
accepted | Why does the ★-property rule of the Bell-Lapadula Model allow information to be stored in objects with HIGHER sensitivity labels? |
|
Apr 22 |
comment |
Why does the ★-property rule of the Bell-Lapadula Model allow information to be stored in objects with HIGHER sensitivity labels? Thanks D.W, this is EXACTLY what I was looking for. |
|
Apr 22 |
comment |
Why does the ★-property rule of the Bell-Lapadula Model allow information to be stored in objects with HIGHER sensitivity labels? Thanks for the clarification. I'm not a programmer so perhaps that's where my confusion is coming from. |
|
Apr 22 |
awarded | Student |
|
Apr 22 |
comment |
Why does the ★-property rule of the Bell-Lapadula Model allow information to be stored in objects with HIGHER sensitivity labels? Hi John, thanks for the prompt response! I see your point and I guess it doesn't hurt for something to be more secure. As for why it shouldn't happen, I guess it just doesn't make sense to me for a subject to not be able to "read" the same place that they're "writing" to. How would they know if they're overwriting something? It also seems like it would dilute the purpose of the object. If I'm storing "confidential" information in an object that's really intended to keep "Top Secret" information, I'm reducing it's effectiveness. Perhaps I'm over-thinking this though. |
|
Apr 22 |
asked | Why does the ★-property rule of the Bell-Lapadula Model allow information to be stored in objects with HIGHER sensitivity labels? |
|
Apr 15 |
awarded | Quorum |
|
Apr 15 |
awarded | Supporter |
