meta user
network profile
| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 2 months |
| seen | 15 hours ago | |
| stats | profile views | 41 |
|
Mar 28 |
comment |
Why don't wifi managers remember mac addresses for hotspots to defeat the jasager attack? No wai under Windows? |
|
Mar 28 |
comment |
Why don't wifi managers remember mac addresses for hotspots to defeat the jasager attack? +1 to the question. Is there a way to connect to an AP with given SSID and MAC? E.g. if you have 2 APs with same SSID and want to be connected to one of them regardless to signal strength. |
|
Mar 28 |
comment |
DNS Spoofing vs DNS Cache Poisoning So is DNS spoofing a result and DNS poisoning - a way to the result? |
|
Mar 27 |
comment |
Was WPS fixed (wifi)? Thank for describing of WPS vulnerability.. oh wait, I already knew it! For some reasons, WPS bruteforce with reaver doesn't work for that people. Wonder why. |
|
Mar 27 |
comment |
Was WPS fixed (wifi)? What the heck? Who downwotes and why? No, I doesn't have a source, but people who hack WPS tell that newer devices are unhackable, that's why I ask. |
|
Mar 27 |
asked | Was WPS fixed (wifi)? |
|
Mar 21 |
comment |
Why don't major browsers currently support TLS above version 1.0? I've heard that Lucky13 was not fixed. |
|
Mar 21 |
revised |
Why don't major browsers currently support TLS above version 1.0? added 26 characters in body |
|
Mar 21 |
comment |
Why don't major browsers currently support TLS above version 1.0? See question update. |
|
Mar 21 |
revised |
Why don't major browsers currently support TLS above version 1.0? added 253 characters in body; edited title |
|
Mar 21 |
comment |
Why don't major browsers currently support TLS above version 1.0? The link only talks about Chrome. |
|
Mar 20 |
revised |
Why don't major browsers currently support TLS above version 1.0? added 108 characters in body |
|
Mar 20 |
revised |
Why don't major browsers currently support TLS above version 1.0? added 1406 characters in body |
|
Mar 19 |
revised |
Why don't major browsers currently support TLS above version 1.0? Expanded the question to make it more clear |
|
Mar 19 |
comment |
Why don't major browsers currently support TLS above version 1.0? <_There has been compatibility problems with servers that has not activated the newer protocols._> - you can still fallback to older versions. The problem is the clients. |
|
Mar 19 |
comment |
Are there any statistics about webservers and browsers TLS support? @Jonas but still... Usually that was Microsoft who made security fails like LM/NTLM authentication used even now. |
|
Mar 19 |
asked | Why don't major browsers currently support TLS above version 1.0? |
|
Mar 18 |
comment |
How would one crack a weak but unknown encryption protocol? It is a rule. |
|
Mar 18 |
comment |
HTML encoding to protect against XSS ha.ckers.org/xss.html - I lol'd, who calls a page of 100 kb text a cheat sheet? |
|
Mar 18 |
comment |
HTML encoding to protect against XSS +100500 to template frameworks and +100500 to OWASP. Only PHP monkeys seem not to use frameworks, see "PHP: Fractal of bad design". |
