| bio | website | traveljournal.net |
|---|---|---|
| location | Netherlands | |
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 2 years, 1 month |
| seen | Jan 31 at 11:06 | |
| stats | profile views | 106 |
The more I learn about security, the more I realise I don't know anything about the subject.
|
May 14 |
awarded | Critic |
|
May 14 |
revised |
Password Hashing add salt + pepper or is salt enough? edited tags |
|
May 12 |
awarded | Teacher |
|
May 10 |
comment |
How to securely hash passwords? @nealmcb, The OpenBSD implementation of BCrypt, as deployed as part of the operating system, has built in salts (as do some JAVA implementations). This salt salting is handled by the implementation specific wrapper/helper functions. The CodaHale.com article takes the Provos & Mazières paper (dealing with the OpenBSD implementation) out of it's context and suggests that the BCrypt hashing algorithm has build in salts. This is a false suggestion; the BCrypt hashing algorithm itself does not have build-in salts. |
|
Apr 26 |
revised |
Surfing anynomously added 1 characters in body |
|
Apr 26 |
answered | Surfing anynomously |
|
Apr 26 |
suggested | suggested edit on Possibility of undetectable encryption system |
|
Apr 23 |
comment |
Password Hashing add salt + pepper or is salt enough? Hmm, the edit removed the much of the uncertainty present in the answer as written by @Jesper Mortensen. Maybe the edit should be rolled back and moved to a separate answer? |
|
Apr 23 |
revised |
Password Hashing add salt + pepper or is salt enough? Removed the "PBKDF2". see also: http://security.stackexchange.com/questions/2051/is-pbkdf2-based-system-cryptology-rfc2898derivebytes-better-for-unicode-passw/2056#2056; deleted 1 characters in body |
|
Apr 22 |
comment |
Password Hashing add salt + pepper or is salt enough? I'm trying to wrap my brain around "Adding a key the hash transforms it into a MAC". Am I correct in understanding that, by adding a constant value (along with the password and salt) into the hashing algorithm, the changed use of the primitive affect the stength of the outcome? And that, if the key is known, the overall scheme is likely to be less secure? |
|
Apr 22 |
revised |
Password Hashing add salt + pepper or is salt enough? edited body |
|
Apr 22 |
awarded | Student |
|
Apr 22 |
revised |
Password Hashing add salt + pepper or is salt enough? added 6 characters in body |
|
Apr 22 |
revised |
Password Hashing add salt + pepper or is salt enough? added 9 characters in body |
|
Apr 22 |
comment |
How to securely hash passwords? The article linked by @Rory McCune is, as far as I know, flawed in suggesting that using BCrypt makes salting unnecessary. This is not true and based on his misinterpretation of the Provos & Mazières paper linked by him. |
|
Apr 22 |
revised |
Password Hashing add salt + pepper or is salt enough? deleted 12 characters in body |
|
Apr 22 |
comment |
Password Hashing add salt + pepper or is salt enough? @Marcin, No, I'm asking exactly what's written in the question. I'm not interested in the purpose of the salt. I'm looking for the possible increase in security by adding a secret key to the hash. |
|
Apr 22 |
awarded | Editor |
|
Apr 22 |
revised |
Password Hashing add salt + pepper or is salt enough? added 166 characters in body; added 201 characters in body |
|
Apr 22 |
asked | Password Hashing add salt + pepper or is salt enough? |