332 reputation
211
bio website blog.esskar.de
location Germany
age 35
visits member for 3 years, 5 months
seen Nov 21 at 9:26

creator of schmoose, passionate about software development and more ... far more ...


Nov
21
comment NaCL: Encrypt file to multiple recipients
Hi Tom. Thanks for explanation. I am actually already using OpenPGP, but the message overhead is massive. NaCL produces smaller messages, and that was what i was looking for.
Sep
30
comment NaCL: Encrypt file to multiple recipients
@raz anything that helps me to nail the multiple recipient problem
Sep
30
revised NaCL: Encrypt file to multiple recipients
update of what i want to do and idea
Sep
29
asked NaCL: Encrypt file to multiple recipients
Apr
15
awarded  Notable Question
Feb
6
awarded  Nice Question
Sep
14
answered Are self-signed certificates actually more secure than CA signed certificates now?
Sep
2
awarded  Commentator
Sep
2
comment ECC in (Open)PGP
@KayproII not sure, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ECC_patents says that patent is only on implementation technique not on the actual idea behind ECC!
Aug
31
awarded  Popular Question
May
14
revised RFC 6637: Algorithm-Specific Fields for ECDH
tell people about RFC 6637 support.
May
12
comment RFC 6637: Algorithm-Specific Fields for ECDH
it is not yet finished. i will push everything to this git repository: github.com/esskar/BouncyCastle.Crypto
May
12
accepted RFC 6637: Algorithm-Specific Fields for ECDH
May
12
comment RFC 6637: Algorithm-Specific Fields for ECDH
yes, that explains it well. i should have looked up the word "ephemeral" in the dictionary! :-)
May
12
revised RFC 6637: Algorithm-Specific Fields for ECDH
better understanding of what the public key is
May
12
revised RFC 6637: Algorithm-Specific Fields for ECDH
fixed the links
May
12
accepted User Groups (Circles) Inside a Web of Trust
May
12
comment User Groups (Circles) Inside a Web of Trust
a make this the answer, because it is good and it is the only one. cheers and thanks.
May
12
asked RFC 6637: Algorithm-Specific Fields for ECDH
Apr
30
comment User Groups (Circles) Inside a Web of Trust
@TildalWave: i added the section about "designated revoker". any thoughts on that?