meta user
network profile
| bio | website | ali.moeeny.com |
|---|---|---|
| location | Washington, DC | |
| age | 34 | |
| visits | member for | 1 year, 9 months |
| seen | Mar 31 at 17:29 | |
| stats | profile views | 24 |
I love to build things that people love to use.
I like scientific data analysis.
I've spent most of my life in medicine and neuroscience!
I like: vim, zsh, python, debian
I am addicted to writing code! and learning new things!!
|
Dec 6 |
answered | Best approach for making an app that connects to sensitive information |
|
Dec 1 |
comment |
What are the security implications of SSH tunneling? Aha! Got it, that is correct, if a tunnel exposes a vulnerable machine/service to the public side I have practically punched a hole into the defenses. |
|
Dec 1 |
accepted | What are the security implications of SSH tunneling? |
|
Dec 1 |
awarded | Commentator |
|
Dec 1 |
comment |
What are the security implications of SSH tunneling? So if I understand it correctly, having people open a tunnel when they need it by ssh -D ... from either side is no "additional" problem (more than giving people ssh access in the first place). |
|
Nov 30 |
comment |
What are the security implications of SSH tunneling? thanks, so if the users are not potential trouble makers, and they already need to SSH into the edge machine for other reasons, both from the internal lan and from the public lan, and from home via VPN, there is no "additional" problem with tunneling all by itself, correct? |
|
Nov 30 |
asked | What are the security implications of SSH tunneling? |
|
Nov 29 |
accepted | What is the security implications of enabling SSH onward connections |
|
Nov 28 |
asked | What is the security implications of enabling SSH onward connections |
|
Nov 24 |
comment |
Ubuntu home folder encryption, compared with file vault @RoryAlsop I don't want to wast your or my time much on this, but choice of disk encryption for laptops is a serious requirement which in practice affects a lot of other choices, like where I work you can not use a laptop + OS combination that does not provide an approved disk encryption. This means many people are stuck (or at least were stuck for a long time) with windows + slow software encryption. In theory this is not an interesting IT sec question but in practice it affects lots of other things. |
|
Nov 24 |
comment |
Ubuntu home folder encryption, compared with file vault Sorry, I modified the question to make it more clear and relevant. Can we reopen it now? |
|
Nov 24 |
revised |
Ubuntu home folder encryption, compared with file vault added 10 characters in body; edited title |
|
Nov 24 |
comment |
Ubuntu home folder encryption, compared with file vault This is mostly a user experience discussion, I want to know if people have had any negative experience (data loss, security/privacy problems, performance problems...) |
|
Nov 24 |
asked | Ubuntu home folder encryption, compared with file vault |
|
Sep 14 |
accepted | Do I really need all these Certificate Authorities in my browser or in my keychain? |
|
Sep 12 |
asked | Do I really need all these Certificate Authorities in my browser or in my keychain? |
|
Sep 8 |
awarded | Scholar |
|
Sep 8 |
accepted | I see two different sets of certificates for Google websites when I am at work and when I am at home |
|
Sep 7 |
comment |
I see two different sets of certificates for Google websites when I am at work and when I am at home All the metadata (as well as the SHA1 and MD5 which is displayed in the FF certificate viewer) are exactly the same! Only when I export them they are different! |
|
Sep 6 |
comment |
I see two different sets of certificates for Google websites when I am at work and when I am at home I would do it tomorrow and post the result here. |
