meta user
network profile
| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | Brisbane, Australia | |
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 1 year, 8 months |
| seen | 7 hours ago | |
| stats | profile views | 99 |
|
Feb 12 |
awarded | Nice Answer |
|
Feb 3 |
comment |
What is the “derive” key usage? Are you able to provide the OID of the key usages (e.g. 1.3.6.1.5.5.7.3.1) |
|
Dec 25 |
comment |
At what level of abstraction should a developer work with with regards to cryptography? Obfuscation has it's place but not everywhere is the right place. Equally obfuscation can decrease internal understanding of a configuration by the people who run it, this increases the risk of error, which decreases security over time and also reduces the ability to detect security events of interest. |
|
Sep 15 |
awarded | Yearling |
|
Jul 24 |
comment |
What are the vulnerabilities of using NFC on my Samsung SGS3? Clarification, NFC is capable of two way communication. RFID is not. |
|
Jul 24 |
comment |
What are the vulnerabilities of using NFC on my Samsung SGS3? Do you have any supporting references? |
|
Jul 12 |
revised |
Is there a way to mitigate BEAST without disabling AES completely? edited tags |
|
Jul 11 |
comment |
Reverse scan from cloud authentication server What make you think that these ports would be open or if they are open that they are abusing your service? Scanning anyone on the Internet without explicit consent is ambiguous. For instance, if one of my users signed up to your service that in no way implies I agree with your scan. I would look for other countermeasures such as black lists and captcha for automated signup. |
|
Jul 3 |
comment |
What prevents people getting charged over NFC in crowded places? Additional information from 2006. events.iaik.tugraz.at/RFIDSec06/Program/papers/… |
|
Jun 23 |
awarded | Scholar |
|
Jun 23 |
accepted | Fingerprinting Hash Function |
|
Jun 22 |
comment |
Fingerprinting Hash Function @Gilles +1 Yes this is a good point. |
|
Jun 22 |
comment |
Fingerprinting Hash Function @cryptopathe Sorry if this was unclear. The questions has been updated. The intension was to use the resulting output as a key (in addition to message verification) if it is impractical that a key collision will occur. The purpose of adding additional data was to reduce the dataset that may produce the same hash output. |
|
Jun 22 |
revised |
Fingerprinting Hash Function Updated question to clarify unkeyed answer |
|
Jun 21 |
revised |
Fingerprinting Hash Function deleted 1 characters in body; edited body |
|
Jun 21 |
revised |
Fingerprinting Hash Function added unsigned integer for clarity |
|
Jun 21 |
awarded | Student |
|
Jun 21 |
comment |
“Double hashing” with 2 different hash functions To clarify, 2 to the power of 256 is permutations of the hash function output not the input. |
|
Jun 21 |
comment |
Determining the point of compromise on an infected web server? Some information here security.stackexchange.com/questions/7443/… |
|
Jun 21 |
asked | Fingerprinting Hash Function |
