meta user
network profile
| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 1 year, 6 months |
| seen | 39 mins ago | |
| stats | profile views | 5 |
|
May 10 |
comment |
Is OpenGL a security problem? Very interesting - I knew that it was hard to access the GPU over remote login sessions, but never suspected the reason was security... I also mostly agree with respect to exploiting the GPU being harder than exploiting user carelessness, but still, there is an important distinction - cautious users CAN verify the permissions before installing, but there is no permission for OpenGL. |
|
May 9 |
awarded | Nice Question |
|
May 9 |
asked | Is OpenGL a security problem? |
|
Feb 20 |
awarded | Notable Question |
|
Jan 31 |
awarded | Nice Question |
|
Nov 19 |
awarded | Popular Question |
|
Nov 9 |
accepted | SRP: Can the client authenticate using only the stored hash? |
|
Nov 9 |
asked | SRP: Can the client authenticate using only the stored hash? |
|
Nov 2 |
awarded | Yearling |
|
Aug 22 |
awarded | Scholar |
|
Aug 22 |
accepted | Can an intermediate CA be trusted like a self-signed root CA? |
|
Jul 22 |
awarded | Nice Answer |
|
Jul 20 |
awarded | Citizen Patrol |
|
Jul 20 |
answered | How to store salt? |
|
Jul 19 |
comment |
Can an intermediate CA be trusted like a self-signed root CA? Yes, they do. So it really is by design that the clients refuse to use the intermediate certs as roots of the validation process? Is that a consequence of the chain always being anchored by the root CA? |
|
Jul 19 |
asked | Can an intermediate CA be trusted like a self-signed root CA? |
|
Jul 12 |
comment |
Is there a way to mitigate BEAST without disabling AES completely? Are you serious? TLS 1.1 will only be supported in the upcoming version 21 of Chrome and is not supported in Firefox, and I don't even want to begin to research the state of TLS 1.1 support on mobile devices. |
|
Jul 11 |
asked | Is there a way to mitigate BEAST without disabling AES completely? |
|
Feb 5 |
awarded | Student |
|
Feb 5 |
asked | L2TP/IPsec shared secret: Can it be public? |
