network profile
| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 1 year, 6 months |
| seen | Apr 4 at 20:48 | |
| stats | profile views | 3 |
|
Jan 31 |
awarded | Popular Question |
|
Dec 16 |
comment |
openssl verify signature As it does not seem to be possible, I'll just accept your answer regarding our comments. |
|
Dec 16 |
accepted | openssl verify signature |
|
Nov 17 |
comment |
openssl verify signature Right, so you agree with what I said in previous comment: it's not "sign message digest" as you used in your answer, it's just "sign message" as "sign message digest" would imply "encrypt digest of message digest" :) anyway, the above commands do not output PKCS7 objects, just plain signature. I was hoping command line openssl tool would be able to the PKCS7_sign that the (openssl) library provides openssl.org/docs/crypto/PKCS7_sign.html but it seems it can't... |
|
Nov 17 |
awarded | Supporter |
|
Nov 17 |
comment |
openssl verify signature One other question, on pure terminology, you say "sign a message digest", but it is "encrypt message digest" or "sign message" right? As signing is basically encrypting an hash, as far I as understand. |
|
Nov 17 |
awarded | Editor |
|
Nov 17 |
revised |
openssl verify signature added 111 characters in body |
|
Nov 17 |
comment |
openssl verify signature Thanks Zedman, but I meant signing into a PKCS#7 object just like smime option does (and verifying from a PKCS#7 public key certificate as well). I'll add this to the question to become more explicit. |
|
Nov 16 |
asked | openssl verify signature |
|
Nov 16 |
awarded | Scholar |
|
Nov 16 |
comment |
Null content digitally signed message Thanks for the quick confirmation mikeazo, it's all I needed but I'm accepting Thomas answer for the additional useful info. |
|
Nov 16 |
accepted | Null content digitally signed message |
|
Nov 16 |
awarded | Student |
|
Nov 16 |
asked | Null content digitally signed message |
