network profile
| bio | website | hensec.blogspot.co.il |
|---|---|---|
| location | Israel | |
| age | 27 | |
| visits | member for | 1 year, 6 months |
| seen | May 5 at 18:41 | |
| stats | profile views | 28 |
|
Mar 22 |
awarded | Popular Question |
|
Mar 4 |
awarded | Notable Question |
|
Feb 13 |
awarded | Popular Question |
|
Jan 30 |
comment |
How can PayPal spoof emails so easily to say it comes from someone else? @Polynomial probably you don't remember what he said there, since in these two podcast he talks exactly on what the question here was. I was a listener of this podcast too but i didn't stop because he makes up stuff since i think that he good at explaining how the technology works behind. to sum up in my answer here i have provided the questioner a source for knowing better on the issue he arise. |
|
Jan 29 |
comment |
How can PayPal spoof emails so easily to say it comes from someone else? @Polynomial I think that you should listen to these two podcast BEFORE commenting about Steve Gibson, i am not saying that Steve is right in everything he say but he his a knowledgeable guy. I think that your comment isn't right here since you shouldn't open a debate about Steve G. here. |
|
Dec 31 |
awarded | Notable Question |
|
Dec 24 |
comment |
Detecting reflective DLL injection it is the same as here: stackoverflow.com/questions/12697292/… You should update your question here too. |
|
Dec 24 |
comment |
Detecting reflective DLL injection The whole purpose of reflective DLL injection is that you never write injected DLL file on disk so that you can avoid detection by AV. If you don't have the file on disk you can't use the regular injection technique (i.e CreateRemoteThread) hence you should use something as reflective DLL injection and that BTW makes the detection of the injected DLL harder. |
|
Dec 5 |
asked | How can I detect if someone is sniffing network packets on the LAN? |
|
Nov 24 |
awarded | Yearling |
|
Oct 16 |
awarded | Popular Question |
|
Aug 30 |
awarded | Popular Question |
|
Feb 14 |
accepted | Is a wireless receiver a security weak point? |
|
Jan 18 |
awarded | Commentator |
|
Jan 18 |
comment |
How do hackers take advantage of open ports as a vector for an attack? So you should really start with making your programs (services) not sticking their nose to any port from the internet (unless you have to). |
|
Jan 16 |
comment |
Is a wireless receiver a security weak point? @LucasKauffman: I know that wireless is less secure than a bunker. But my question here is about the possibilities that an attacker would have, and more to the point my concern is about that wireless receiver dongle is it like any other wireless card ? |
|
Jan 16 |
comment |
Is a wireless receiver a security weak point? @GrahamHill: You are right, my main concern isn't about sniffing the key strokes from the remote controller since there isn't nothing to worry about that, but I am concern about that little receiver to be a door for an attacker into the computer's data. |
|
Jan 16 |
comment |
Is a wireless receiver a security weak point? In my situation is indeed that all wireless devices are banned, but I thought since it is a remote control maybe there's far less concern about a breach through it. |
|
Jan 16 |
asked | Is a wireless receiver a security weak point? |
|
Dec 14 |
accepted | SIEM system, what are the benefits? |
