268 reputation
16
bio website
location
age
visits member for 1 year, 2 months
seen Apr 9 at 20:56
stats profile views 13

Older than dirt. I got t-shirts older than you, kiddo.


May
2
awarded  Nice Question
Apr
3
comment Is there a spam storm?
Thanks for that last bit. It's interesting how the new spam has successfully avoided the filters like that (when previously the IEEE spam filters worked quite well, compared to my wife's service). But, interestingly, after I marked a bunch of these things "Spam" in Thunderbird it started filtering them pretty aggressively.
Apr
2
awarded  Supporter
Apr
2
revised Is there a spam storm?
added 3235 characters in body
Apr
1
asked Is there a spam storm?
Mar
11
awarded  Yearling
Oct
11
comment Odd spam in a forum
(Right now I'm going with the theory that it's Chinese students practicing their English -- perhaps as a game of sorts, to see if they'll be detected.)
Oct
11
comment Odd spam in a forum
@Ramhound -- Yep, but a bot doesn't make stupid spelling errors either.
Oct
10
awarded  Editor
Oct
10
revised Odd spam in a forum
added 642 characters in body
Oct
4
comment Odd spam in a forum
Except that many of these have no links. There is no link in either the post or the user's profile.
Oct
4
comment Odd spam in a forum
Yeah, but the crummy software (Mollom) on this forum doesn't do "reputation building" to any visible degree. Many first-time posts are blatant spam (with links), while many long-time users get their posts rejected by the "spam filter".
Oct
4
comment Odd spam in a forum
@Ramhound -- Yeah, it may be that they're copying the text from somewhere, but some effort is presumably going into it. And there are typos (like "mol" rather than "mold") and grammar errors that indicate that the text has been retyped and likely edited in some way from the source text.
Oct
4
asked Odd spam in a forum
Apr
4
awarded  Scholar
Apr
4
accepted What is the point of spam like this?
Mar
18
comment How will security need to be changed if P=NP?
@D.W. -- Thanks for the references. It appears that existing public key schemes are at risk, and with that the entire credentials network. That is most likely the weak link: As I read it, a replacement is needed BEFORE the first true massively parallel quantum computer goes online (if that ever happens), since breaking just one cipher places the entire system at risk.
Mar
17
comment How will security need to be changed if P=NP?
The quantum computing guys keep threatening us with infinitely fast computers that will supposedly be able to crack just about anything via brute force. Any comment about that? (I'm personally doubtful that their theories hold water, but if they do it could be bad.)
Mar
14
awarded  Nice Question
Mar
11
awarded  Student