network profile
| bio | website | ru.linkedin.com/in/… |
|---|---|---|
| location | Russia | |
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 1 year |
| seen | Mar 21 at 9:06 | |
| stats | profile views | 5 |
Software developer Java, C#, C
|
Jan 15 |
accepted | Behavior when validating an expired certificate chain |
|
Jan 15 |
comment |
Behavior when validating an expired certificate chain I was looking for word of the standard, but couldn't find one in a bunch of PKI related standards. Thanks. |
|
Jan 14 |
comment |
Behavior when validating an expired certificate chain Unfortunately, I'm not familiar with the term "shell validation model". If you speak about technical side of validation, the certificates are managed by a Java application, thus we use chain validation here. |
|
Jan 14 |
revised |
Behavior when validating an expired certificate chain edited body |
|
Jan 14 |
asked | Behavior when validating an expired certificate chain |
|
Apr 24 |
comment |
X509 mutual authentication: is there a security flaw? I use TLS. But actually I didn't ask about technical details, because I hadn't got any questions there. |
|
Apr 23 |
awarded | Student |
|
Apr 23 |
awarded | Scholar |
|
Apr 23 |
accepted | X509 mutual authentication: is there a security flaw? |
|
Apr 23 |
comment |
X509 mutual authentication: is there a security flaw? I can be sure that initial signing is secure. For sure the things you pointed are implemented and mutual authentication works there. |
|
Apr 23 |
revised |
X509 mutual authentication: is there a security flaw? clarified |
|
Apr 23 |
awarded | Editor |
|
Apr 23 |
revised |
X509 mutual authentication: is there a security flaw? added 4 characters in body |
|
Apr 23 |
awarded | Supporter |
|
Apr 23 |
awarded | Analytical |
|
Apr 23 |
asked | X509 mutual authentication: is there a security flaw? |
