Timeline for What makes TPM chip Endorsement Key Non-migratable?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 21, 2015 at 20:02 | history | edited | Wilbur Whateley | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
I found new information suggesting that the SRK can be correctly discussed in terms of migrateability.
|
| Dec 10, 2015 at 18:52 | comment | added | Wilbur Whateley | This becomes a general discussion of photo-lithography, chip fabrication, and physical properties thereof. It is definitely NOT uniquely related to the TPM. However I think it is within the scope of this SE, just in another question. Then you can assume that a TPM manufacturer might use one of the techniques on their chip, but there is for sure no single answer related to the TPM, this concept is not in the TCG scope. In fact, the TPM spec is generally understood to NOT protect against adversary physical presence or physical attacks, making this discussion EVEN MORE out of TPM scope ;) | |
| Dec 10, 2015 at 3:59 | comment | added | TJCLK | Yes, what I want is "how does a tpm keep these special keys safe". a further question is: what are the common ways to physically secure the keys?? now only one example I know is depending on the package of the chip. once the chip cover is opened, the internal circuit stuff will be damaged. but I'm not sure whether this is dependable, as the damaged circuit may be fixed? | |
| Dec 10, 2015 at 3:03 | review | Late answers | |||
| Dec 10, 2015 at 5:15 | |||||
| Dec 10, 2015 at 2:46 | history | answered | Wilbur Whateley | CC BY-SA 3.0 |