Timeline for How to apply IT Security knowledge to Home Security?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
22 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 3, 2012 at 22:30 | vote | accept | Rick Rhodes | ||
| S Feb 8, 2012 at 20:11 | history | suggested | goblinbox | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
corrected spelling
|
| Feb 8, 2012 at 18:56 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Feb 8, 2012 at 20:11 | |||||
| Feb 8, 2012 at 2:32 | comment | added | Iszi | @JonnyBoats He'd better call it Bumblebee if it does. | |
| Feb 7, 2012 at 21:38 | comment | added | JonnyBoats | Rick: Glad to hear they found your car, lets hope it's not trashed. Lets hope they didn't install a virus, hate to have it become part of a bot-net ;-) | |
| Feb 7, 2012 at 20:59 | history | edited | Rick Rhodes | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 26 characters in body
|
| Feb 7, 2012 at 20:52 | history | edited | Rick Rhodes | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 628 characters in body
|
| Feb 7, 2012 at 20:44 | comment | added | Iszi | I'm not sure whether or not these apply to your situation, but here's a couple direct translations: "Don't use the same password across multiple systems" = "don't keep your car and house keys on the same keyring". "Lock your workstation before walking away" = "don't leave your keys in the ignition". | |
| Feb 7, 2012 at 20:37 | comment | added | Rick Rhodes | @JonnyBoats at this moment, it is just those situation when no one has a clue who or how exactly it was done, not even the police officers. The car has been found a couple minutes ago by police officers. | |
| Feb 7, 2012 at 20:33 | comment | added | Rick Rhodes | @RoryAlsop no problem, I am just giving a read of bunch of articles upon Linux alarm system; I will modify the question accordingly to make it more 'unique'. | |
| Feb 7, 2012 at 20:31 | comment | added | JonnyBoats | I have to ask, were you the victim of a social engineering attack? If so, focus less on hardware based measures. | |
| Feb 7, 2012 at 20:17 | answer | added | Jeff Ferland♦ | timeline score: 25 | |
| Feb 7, 2012 at 20:05 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
remove duplicate link
|
|
| Feb 7, 2012 at 20:05 | history | reopened |
Jeff Ferland♦ Rory Alsop♦ |
||
| Feb 7, 2012 at 20:00 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
insert duplicate link
|
|
| Feb 7, 2012 at 20:00 | history | closed | Rory Alsop♦ | exact duplicate | |
| Feb 7, 2012 at 20:00 | comment | added | Rory Alsop♦ | @Rick - I have been persuaded this question is different enough to the other one that we should save it. (the powers of chat and votes to reopen) - can you improve it a bit though to differentiate it from security.stackexchange.com/questions/1244/… | |
| Feb 7, 2012 at 19:44 | comment | added | Ramhound | Your idea would just be expensive to implement. Are you even looking for serious suggestions? By the sound of it you only want "fun" to implement ideas, not real solutions in which case trying to suggest something is sort of pointless. | |
| Feb 7, 2012 at 19:42 | history | edited | Rory Alsop♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 9 characters in body; edited title
|
| Feb 7, 2012 at 19:37 | comment | added | Rick Rhodes | I should probably add it is more as entertainment/experience rather than actually expecting such thing to be more secure than a professional alarm system | |
| Feb 7, 2012 at 19:35 | comment | added | Ramhound | The sensors and webcams are not going to prevent the crime. You would be better off using door locks where the key cannot be duplicated. In addition look into equipment that allows you to check the status of your home online. An investment in preventing the crime is a better idea then a webcam that will never be watched. | |
| Feb 7, 2012 at 19:24 | history | asked | Rick Rhodes | CC BY-SA 3.0 |