Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 22, 2016 at 13:56 comment added c1646091 vocativ.com/313799/isis-kill-list-hackers - one source, and they're generally anti-technology: slate.com/articles/technology/future_tense/2015/03/…. Their usage of social media is a given, but does anyone recall the last time ISIS actually successfully hacked anyone? Now compare hackivists Anonymous. ISIS are more well known for violence than their technological skills.
May 22, 2016 at 13:48 comment added c1646091 @SeldomNeedy I'm a new user, so I'm capped to two links, so I decided between all the declarations, the bigger two to support would be the zero terrorist plots foiled and China following suit. I did originally attempt to include a link for sources declaring ISIS being technologically incompetent but I was impeded by the link limit. I consider out of the three biggies, that ISIS being incompetent was the most self-evident of the three and therefore dropped the link.
May 21, 2016 at 15:24 comment added anon For the illegal immigrants part, it might be worth saying that yes, the majority are here to keep their heads down and live a decent life, but there are always people who go somewhere to make more money through crime – for example, drug dealers. With fake IDs, they can stay in the country legally as long as they like, rather than the government being able to get rid of them as soon as they're found.
May 19, 2016 at 21:00 comment added Seldom 'Where's Monica' Needy "ISIS have been declared technologically incompetent." {{Citation needed.}}
May 18, 2016 at 12:39 comment added Magisch There's the breaking point of opinion isn't it. Authoritharians have no problems with people losing freedom and privacy, and would like to see people criticising the government in jail. For them, that downside is actually an upside. Enough so that they will gloss over the other downsides.
May 17, 2016 at 20:35 history edited c1646091 CC BY-SA 3.0
Grammatical correction to sentence.
May 17, 2016 at 20:28 history edited c1646091 CC BY-SA 3.0
typo correction
May 15, 2016 at 19:52 review First posts
May 15, 2016 at 20:08
May 15, 2016 at 19:49 history answered c1646091 CC BY-SA 3.0