Timeline for Is SWIFT (banking) Software Architecture Secure?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Jun 5, 2016 at 7:13 | history | bounty ended | CommunityBot | ||
| S Jun 5, 2016 at 7:13 | history | notice removed | CommunityBot | ||
| Jun 3, 2016 at 10:02 | vote | accept | Silverfox | ||
| S May 31, 2016 at 23:16 | history | suggested | Forest Monsen | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Clarified a bit, added link to help folks find the SWIFT in question
|
| May 31, 2016 at 22:39 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S May 31, 2016 at 23:16 | |||||
| S May 28, 2016 at 5:25 | history | bounty started | Silverfox | ||
| S May 28, 2016 at 5:25 | history | notice added | Silverfox | Improve details | |
| May 25, 2016 at 3:57 | comment | added | André Borie | I suspect like most banks/big corporations it's still running on 20+ year-old mainframes and the software is awful and while it was (hopefully) designed with security in mind I would't be surprised if there's a ton of vulnerabilities. | |
| May 24, 2016 at 18:06 | answer | added | Jeff Meden | timeline score: 1 | |
| May 24, 2016 at 16:51 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackSecurity/status/735151318160027648 | ||
| May 24, 2016 at 16:35 | answer | added | Trey Blalock | timeline score: 1 | |
| May 24, 2016 at 16:32 | history | edited | Silverfox | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
| May 24, 2016 at 16:02 | history | asked | Silverfox | CC BY-SA 3.0 |