Timeline for How dangerous is it not to load `seccomp` rules for (LXC) development containers?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 2016 at 17:36 | vote | accept | woosting | ||
| Sep 2, 2016 at 9:50 | history | edited | WhiteWinterWolf | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Updated title to restrict the question to development containers, fixed a few typos.
|
| Sep 2, 2016 at 9:48 | answer | added | WhiteWinterWolf | timeline score: 2 | |
| Sep 2, 2016 at 1:36 | history | migrated | from serverfault.com (revisions) | ||
| Aug 25, 2016 at 9:09 | comment | added | woosting | I understand that a "jail escape" by UID0 is one risk. But acknowledging (assuming?) I will be the only one having access to the system, this would not pose an issue for me. But aren't there any other (security / technical stability) risks I should think about? | |
| Aug 25, 2016 at 9:08 | history | asked | woosting | CC BY-SA 3.0 |