Timeline for Does NIST really recommend PBKDF2 for password hashing?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 2021 at 13:59 | history | edited | GustavoTM | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 4 characters in body
|
| Jan 7, 2017 at 23:39 | comment | added | Oleg Gryb | Using PBKDF2 for password hashing is a trend that replaces SHA-256 in new applications, but older apps will continue using SHA. I think, in both cases doing hashing right is important and is a common mistake, e.g. using the same salt for all users, or not having enough entropy in a salt. | |
| Dec 22, 2016 at 20:47 | review | Late answers | |||
| Dec 22, 2016 at 21:01 | |||||
| Dec 22, 2016 at 20:32 | review | First posts | |||
| Dec 22, 2016 at 21:33 | |||||
| Dec 22, 2016 at 20:29 | history | answered | GustavoTM | CC BY-SA 3.0 |