Timeline for Does NIST really recommend PBKDF2 for password hashing?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 2017 at 10:37 | answer | added | eckes | timeline score: 3 | |
| Dec 22, 2016 at 20:29 | answer | added | GustavoTM | timeline score: 11 | |
| Jul 20, 2012 at 22:17 | history | edited | Andrei Botalov |
edited tags
|
|
| May 19, 2012 at 2:15 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackSecurity/status/203670130260058112 | ||
| May 18, 2012 at 6:25 | vote | accept | Lachezar Balev | ||
| May 17, 2012 at 22:57 | comment | added | Alex | lol, only if theyve already cracked it ;-) | |
| May 17, 2012 at 21:19 | answer | added | David M | timeline score: 11 | |
| May 17, 2012 at 18:06 | comment | added | Lachezar Balev | We store password hashes in order to authenticate users later when they log in :-) | |
| May 17, 2012 at 14:33 | comment | added | David M | The NIST paper is related to algorithms for derivation of a key from a password. You only refer to "password hashing" which is not the same thing. Can you elaborate on the purpose for which you are hashing passwords? | |
| May 17, 2012 at 11:16 | history | asked | Lachezar Balev | CC BY-SA 3.0 |