Timeline for Does the choice of protocol affect the efficiency of a DOS attack?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 2017 at 2:07 | comment | added | Lie Ryan | The overhead of UDP is smaller since it doesn't need to maintain a connection metadata. However, if you are replacing TCP with UDP, chances are that you have a "connection"/"session" metadata in the application layer, which would have increased the UDP overhead as well. | |
| Apr 7, 2017 at 23:14 | answer | added | symcbean | timeline score: 2 | |
| Apr 7, 2017 at 19:36 | review | Close votes | |||
| Apr 10, 2017 at 1:46 | |||||
| Apr 7, 2017 at 12:21 | history | edited | Anders | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 8 characters in body; edited tags; edited title
|
| Apr 7, 2017 at 9:17 | comment | added | jeyejow | what parte of my question does it affect then? <.< | |
| Apr 7, 2017 at 9:14 | comment | added | niilzon | It totally does (no pun intended)... A denial of service can be achieved locally without network communication | |
| Apr 7, 2017 at 9:10 | vote | accept | jeyejow | ||
| Apr 7, 2017 at 9:03 | answer | added | Elias | timeline score: 4 | |
| Apr 7, 2017 at 8:53 | comment | added | jeyejow | That doesnt really affect the question :V | |
| Apr 7, 2017 at 8:48 | comment | added | niilzon | you probably mean DDOS, not DOS ? | |
| Apr 7, 2017 at 8:13 | review | First posts | |||
| Apr 7, 2017 at 13:30 | |||||
| Apr 7, 2017 at 8:09 | history | asked | jeyejow | CC BY-SA 3.0 |