Timeline for Is Intel i3 CPU affected by the Intel ME vulnerability?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oct 19, 2017 at 11:57 | comment | added | forgetful | TXT is not a bad thing. It provides things like measured boots. Same with BootGuard. While it is not great from a freedom standpoint (you can't install your own BIOS), it completely prevents BIOS-based rootkits. | |
Aug 31, 2017 at 21:22 | comment | added | Hexagon | @Polynomial on the Intel website it says vPro is not available, so I guess they were referring to AMT? | |
Aug 30, 2017 at 19:01 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackSecurity/status/902969497673486342 | ||
Aug 30, 2017 at 18:49 | comment | added | Polynomial | vPRO is not a single feature; it's a marketing term for a whole range of features (HyperThreading, VT-x, TXT, AMT, etc). The PCH (chipset) having support for those features does not mean that they are inherently enabled because the processor must also support them. | |
Aug 30, 2017 at 14:13 | answer | added | Polynomial | timeline score: 4 | |
Aug 29, 2017 at 22:25 | history | edited | Hexagon | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
update, added new information
|
Aug 29, 2017 at 20:05 | history | edited | Hexagon | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
Aug 29, 2017 at 19:59 | history | edited | Hexagon | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
Aug 29, 2017 at 19:53 | review | First posts | |||
Aug 29, 2017 at 20:16 | |||||
Aug 29, 2017 at 19:52 | history | asked | Hexagon | CC BY-SA 3.0 |