Skip to main content
12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Sep 21, 2017 at 18:17 answer added Exhibitioner timeline score: 0
Sep 17, 2017 at 17:23 vote accept Bufke
Sep 17, 2017 at 17:21 comment added vidarlo @Bufke Thanks :) Too short for an answer in my opinion, but...
Sep 17, 2017 at 17:21 answer added vidarlo timeline score: 1
Sep 16, 2017 at 18:47 answer added ShayanKM timeline score: 0
Sep 16, 2017 at 18:33 comment added vidarlo It's slightly more work - but it's significantly easier for the user if they read their e-mail on a separate device, and also provides whatever security level you require without a long string.
Sep 16, 2017 at 15:20 comment added Bufke @vidarlo I like your answer a lot. It's slightly more development intensive having basically two systems to confirmation but really checks all the UX boxes.
Sep 16, 2017 at 15:13 comment added vidarlo Provide a URL with a long identifier, user not having to login, and a short 4-digit code, where the user has to log in, and limit to for instance 5 attempts per 24hr. And it's not like it's hard to get an e-mail account today, so it's of limited overall value.
Sep 16, 2017 at 14:47 comment added Steffen Ullrich @Bufke: if the user is entering the code within the same session as he created the user then you already have the identity belonging to the token and there is no need to ask for it again. An attacker would not only need to guess the token but also the session cookie. If the user is outside the session (maybe different browser) you can still ask for the claimed identity.
Sep 16, 2017 at 14:42 comment added Bufke I think the token with email link is a pretty good solution. But it removes the ability to just view the confirmation code in email and type it in. I imagine some situation where a user see the code fly up in a notification on their phone and just types it in on their desktop. That said this may still be the best UX possible. I might be over thinking possible papercuts when signing up. That said I see a lot of short codes out in the wild.
Sep 16, 2017 at 14:32 comment added TrickyDupes Why not just use a token in the url link the email contains? One that ids the user and authenticates the request, that way it is all automatic? No need for codes etc.
Sep 16, 2017 at 14:23 history asked Bufke CC BY-SA 3.0