Timeline for Quick scan of a /8 subnet with nmap
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2018 at 0:06 | comment | added | ximaera | Oh, I see. Added a few notes to my answer, thanks. | |
| Jan 16, 2018 at 21:47 | comment | added | Robert Riedl | True, the point I was trying to make was that he might be blocked, unnecessarily, automatically. Also, with a ping check alone, I haven't been able to see noteworthy speed increase with parallelism. In my personal experience -T5 was enough. | |
| Jan 16, 2018 at 21:35 | comment | added | ximaera | A network scan by itself could trip up some security mechanisms, because there are appliances which intentionally detect, report and block network scanners. My assumption is that the author has all the permissions to do what he wants to do. If his activity is not sanctioned by the security personnel, what's the point in showing him ways to avoid being detected? | |
| Jan 16, 2018 at 17:22 | history | edited | multithr3at3d | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
`-sP` deprecated in favor of `-sn`
|
| Jan 16, 2018 at 15:14 | review | First posts | |||
| Jan 16, 2018 at 16:08 | |||||
| Jan 16, 2018 at 15:11 | history | answered | Robert Riedl | CC BY-SA 3.0 |