Skip to main content
29 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Nov 20, 2018 at 17:51 comment added gerrit Point (3) is problematic because of privacy and because it's terribly embarrassing for the children later on. Do not post pictures of people too young to consent.
Jun 15, 2018 at 17:24 comment added Nomad OT: How about Facebook hiring psychologists and psychiatrists to see how they can manipulate you in coming back? That's what really freaked me out.
Jun 15, 2018 at 17:16 answer added Steve Sether timeline score: -1
Apr 23, 2018 at 21:49 comment added Mathieu K. @Barmar, You're quite right that you can do it directly by email, but you may still want to omit certain details, as you have no control over the security precautions taken by your recipients or their mail hosts. (And I think the reasons we used blogs rather than email were [1] that blogs allowed a sort of community via the comments section and [2] that email inboxes at the time were very limited in size, to the point that the pictures from a single blog post could fill them completely.)
Apr 23, 2018 at 16:33 comment added Barmar @MathieuK. Of course, if you only want to share directly with friends, you can just use private email. I don't use any of the popular social media platforms (FB, Twitter, Instagram) myself, but much of the point of them is the dynamic sharing that they permit, so you don't have to keep track of your friends yourself.
Apr 22, 2018 at 22:46 comment added Mathieu K. @Barmar, in the days of blogging, the cautious way to do this was to post as anonymously as possible and give the URL to your friends. That way, a random stranger on the Internet knows nothing useful—no names (initials, maybe), no precise locations, no photos of faces—but your friends can keep up with what's going on in your life. (If you paid and/or you've given them significant personal info on signup, there's always a chance the service itself will be compromised, leaking your info.) Facebook wants users to use their real names, so that puts a bit of a damper on this approach.
Apr 21, 2018 at 20:39 vote accept WoJ
Apr 21, 2018 at 13:37 comment added forest The real issue is that it makes it easier to manipulate you, or gives people dirt that can be used against you later. You do not have to worry about random people abducting your children because you post a picture of them online. That's just silly.
Apr 21, 2018 at 12:01 comment added Barmar @SargeBorsch Doesn't that defeat the purpose of posting? People post this stuff to share their life with their friends. If you post anonymously, how will your friends know it's you?
Apr 21, 2018 at 12:00 comment added Barmar I think you're tilting at a windmill. No amount of warning about dangers is going to get your family to stop. Social media has become a part of modern society. You'd have as much luck as trying to get them to stop driving by pointing out the number of traffic accidents.
Apr 20, 2018 at 19:54 comment added Derek Elkins left SE @WoJ The tangible facts are that literally on the order of a billion people are doing such things. That makes it pretty clear that for the typical person, the increase in risk, if any, is negligible. Even ignoring the overt benefits (i.e. what they would give as their reasons), it can also mitigate physical risk. For example, letting people know where you are and where you plan to be can make it clear when you're missing and where you were last known to be.
Apr 20, 2018 at 18:46 answer added Sumurai8 timeline score: 9
Apr 20, 2018 at 17:59 comment added Display Name between "explicitly put information to the world (typically professional data…)" and "do not put anything", there's also "post it anonymously / from a throwaway account, and carefully double-check for absence of any personal data before you put it out".
Apr 20, 2018 at 16:23 comment added Chris H ... Careless acceptance of friend requests also means that FB friends who you wouldn't trust IRL know a lot about you. The reason I have friends not on FB is that they're teachers who've been burnt by their students seeing up fake profiles in the names of their colleagues to harvest embarrassing info
Apr 20, 2018 at 16:01 history tweeted twitter.com/StackSecurity/status/987360660974686208
Apr 20, 2018 at 16:00 comment added Chris H @mbomb007 that's true, but it's not just friends you're worried about: If I click on many individuals in the same Facebook groups as me I can see quite a lot (and they can see quite a lot of my pictures but I'm careful about what I post, knowing that much of it is visible to friends without accounts and therefore to everyone).
Apr 20, 2018 at 15:57 comment added barbecue Feeding society's ridiculous thirst for the latest in paranoid fearmongering...
Apr 20, 2018 at 15:09 answer added mbomb007 timeline score: 3
Apr 20, 2018 at 14:34 comment added mbomb007 It's probably notable that many people who are friends and following on something like Facebook may already know where you live.
Apr 20, 2018 at 14:00 answer added Chris H timeline score: 12
Apr 20, 2018 at 13:48 comment added Chris H Look at this cat standing in my kitchen in front of the window with the broken latch -- i.e. consider the background.
Apr 20, 2018 at 13:32 comment added WoJ @KonradRudolph: no, I have subjective views which I would like to validate or invalidate with tangible facts. I would be glad to change my mind faced with some data points.
Apr 20, 2018 at 13:27 comment added Konrad Rudolph You seem to have made up your mind and are now hunting for evidence to confirm your conclusions. Usually one should proceed the other way round: going from evidence to conclusion.
Apr 20, 2018 at 12:43 answer added Limit timeline score: 6
Apr 20, 2018 at 12:40 answer added Tobi Nary timeline score: 30
Apr 20, 2018 at 12:17 history edited WoJ CC BY-SA 3.0
edited body
Apr 20, 2018 at 12:08 answer added Fon Korn timeline score: 15
Apr 20, 2018 at 11:59 history edited WoJ CC BY-SA 3.0
edited title
Apr 20, 2018 at 11:53 history asked WoJ CC BY-SA 3.0