Timeline for Why is an HSM required to protect CA certificates (rather than a regular USB token)?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 28, 2022 at 7:54 | answer | added | jans | timeline score: 0 | |
| Nov 27, 2022 at 3:01 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackSecurity/status/1596700644739465216 | ||
| Jul 13, 2018 at 6:54 | vote | accept | lofidevops | ||
| Jul 11, 2018 at 15:45 | answer | added | Shane Andrie | timeline score: 5 | |
| Jul 11, 2018 at 14:03 | answer | added | Mike Ounsworth | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jul 11, 2018 at 12:34 | comment | added | J.A.K. |
In YubiSecure? R Künnemann gives the following description: In the second part of the paper, we analyze the security of the protocol with respect to an adversary that has temporary access to the authentication server. To address this scenario, Yubico offers a small Hardware Security Module (HSM) called the YubiHSM, intended to protect keys even in the event of server compromise.
|
|
| Jul 11, 2018 at 9:42 | history | edited | lofidevops | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
better terminology
|
| Jul 11, 2018 at 9:37 | history | asked | lofidevops | CC BY-SA 4.0 |