Timeline for Global Blackout is a myth?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 2012 at 10:38 | comment | added | Polynomial | You're making highly generalised statements about a ridiculously complex political and technical scenario, with no technical or statistical analysis, and zero empirical evidence. We're downvoting your answer because it's not an answer, it's pure conjecture. | |
| Sep 14, 2012 at 10:08 | comment | added | John Santos | Oh come on, my statement is not political. Think out of the box! I am speaking of a "probability" of a well coordinated attack, and the very reason why people are down voting this opinion is because they have been agitated by this radical way of thinking, and that emotional feeling to down vote was also the same feeling that makes people vulnerable. There's no need to ran down a technical diagram of how anycast works. In security you don't stand at one side, stand in the middle. It's basically a matter of finding the right balance on a couple of different axises. | |
| Sep 14, 2012 at 6:15 | comment | added | Polynomial | This site isn't for political statements or conjecture. It's a Q&A site where we expect objective and well-sourced answers. | |
| Sep 14, 2012 at 2:31 | comment | added | John Santos | I'm making a statement and people should learn to analyze the statement first before looking for a technical analysis. -- Committing a global blackout is possible {"only"} with a well coordinated terrorist plan... - | |
| Sep 13, 2012 at 9:14 | comment | added | Polynomial | -1. There's no technical analysis here. The first two sentences are inaccurate, and the rest is just FUD. The bombing scenario is highly unlikely, due to the distribution of servers across dozens of countries. | |
| Sep 12, 2012 at 9:10 | comment | added | John Santos | everything is possible. | |
| Sep 10, 2012 at 9:52 | history | answered | John Santos | CC BY-SA 3.0 |