Skip to main content
28 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 2, 2019 at 0:49 comment added forest with file extensions hidden in something like Windows File Explorer. Even if you set it to show full file extensions, it could still be an executable with unicode reversal characters in the filename. I wrote an example of that in an unrelated answer.
Apr 1, 2019 at 20:33 history edited Matthew CC BY-SA 4.0
added 54 characters in body
Apr 1, 2019 at 13:15 answer added rydwolf timeline score: 0
S Apr 1, 2019 at 9:23 history suggested unor
added tag --
Mar 31, 2019 at 21:29 review Suggested edits
S Apr 1, 2019 at 9:23
Mar 31, 2019 at 14:02 comment added Lightness Races in Orbit I also have a sneaking suspicion that the colleagues' reactions were not due to a risk analysis of opening HTML source in a text editor (or sedding to screen), but due to a lack of understanding. Though that's hard to prove of course.
Mar 31, 2019 at 13:59 comment added Lightness Races in Orbit @mckenzm Peter's point, and he's correct, is that if we reduce this to a binary yes/no answer, the answer is NO (as in, no it's not safe). But, in reality few things are binary yes/no, and the true answer here, per my post, is that this is well below the threshold for tolerance in my view.
Mar 31, 2019 at 13:05 comment added Sebastiaan van den Broek If you’re in the kind of environment where opening a html file in a text editor is considered risky, you’re in an environment that shouldn’t have access to the internet in the first place.
Mar 31, 2019 at 2:28 comment added mckenzm @ Peter Cordes The question seeks a binary yes/no answer. Looking at TNEP text or filtered (sed) cat of the content is safe, as is printing it to paper. It has to be transport neutral (Base64, say), and there is always hexdump. So yes, there are safe ways. It does not have to be nano/pico/vi/emacs/gedit.
Mar 31, 2019 at 2:21 answer added AnonSecurityUser95 timeline score: 3
Mar 31, 2019 at 0:47 comment added Peter Cordes @mckenzm: did you look at the existing answers before commenting? The question is not that trivial to answer "no" to. A bug in handling invalid UTF-8 sequences could exist, for example.
Mar 30, 2019 at 22:57 comment added mckenzm Opened as text nothing can run, so no risk.
Mar 30, 2019 at 20:05 answer added Lightness Races in Orbit timeline score: 20
S Mar 30, 2019 at 15:50 history suggested Peter Mortensen CC BY-SA 4.0
Copy edited (e.g. ref. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTML>, <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Notepad_%28software%29>, and <https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/browser#Noun>).
Mar 30, 2019 at 15:09 comment added ctrl-alt-delor Yes. It the file is a test, and you open it, and see that it is a test, then you may be tempted to tell others. Thus destroying the efficacy of the test. Also if people are being punished for making mistakes, then your company can not learn; mistakes will be covered up.
Mar 30, 2019 at 13:58 answer added tasket timeline score: 7
Mar 30, 2019 at 8:21 comment added Jerry B @PeterMortensen : A VBS file is not an HTML file…
Mar 30, 2019 at 0:43 comment added Peter Mortensen A famous example is AnnaKournikova.jpg.vbs (Anna Kournikova (computer virus))
Mar 30, 2019 at 0:41 review Suggested edits
S Mar 30, 2019 at 15:50
Mar 30, 2019 at 0:11 answer added George M Reinstate Monica timeline score: 20
Mar 29, 2019 at 17:48 comment added Vit All these answers are way to extreme. If you want to open a html file in a text editor go ahead, as long as there is nothing executable with it.
Mar 29, 2019 at 17:32 answer added reed timeline score: 7
Mar 29, 2019 at 15:00 history tweeted twitter.com/StackSecurity/status/1111644357080293377
Mar 29, 2019 at 13:43 history became hot network question
Mar 29, 2019 at 12:54 answer added Thomas timeline score: 41
Mar 29, 2019 at 12:42 answer added Overmind timeline score: 1
Mar 29, 2019 at 12:28 history migrated from serverfault.com (revisions)
Mar 29, 2019 at 11:39 history asked Matthew CC BY-SA 4.0