Timeline for Encrypt Text Message as Image
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
17 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 28, 2022 at 20:23 | comment | added | William Martens | @display_info note I am still waiting for the link that tor would be compromised. if you heard it, Please provide me with any info of how or when or who, because else I can't do anything else than just assume it's (at least not compromised) (not stating it is not, but not stating the opposite either) because without source or evidence, it's just leaved as is. | |
| Sep 26, 2020 at 19:53 | comment | added | display_info | I just answer to your question in turn. For example, Whatsapp uses the encryption proto which was not compromised, but in my country (Russian) people can buy anyone's whatsapp chats history, illegally of couse... | |
| Sep 26, 2020 at 19:39 | comment | added | William Martens | You're asking a totally different question, and okay I did not know your friend said that. My bad :), I must say that I do believe that widely used, easily availble and free security tools is secure. Because that is for example AES. Everyone can learn how it works, but they still cannot decrypt a message encrypted by AES. And, it's used in HTTPS (Which is unbelievable widely used). AES is used in Bitlocker for encrypting disks in windows. It's used in Luks used in Linux. It's used worldwide. how law enforcmenet agencies can allow that, is another completely different question. | |
| Sep 26, 2020 at 19:27 | comment | added | display_info | 1. I heard this mean from my friend. You cannot check that. 2. I cannot trust that really secure tools could be widely used + easily available + free in the same time. Do you can? How law enforcement agencies can allow that? | |
| Sep 26, 2020 at 19:24 | comment | added | William Martens | Please, provide me with the source that Tor would be compromised, and okay I agree we can use opinions, but please don't make statements based on opinions. It would be much better if I knew where you heard that Tor would be compromised. Where did you hear it from? I trust you that you heard it, but just where? (So I myself can look at it?) | |
| Sep 26, 2020 at 19:21 | comment | added | display_info | I trust to the opinion that Tor is compromised | |
| Sep 26, 2020 at 19:20 | comment | added | William Martens | So, it's a problem that Tor is too much widely used? This is actually the power of Tor. Tor compromised? source? | |
| Sep 26, 2020 at 19:18 | comment | added | display_info | How can I know what tools law enforcement agencies are used? This is the thing I don't know. Endpoint attacks of course are possible unfortunately. Why not use Tor - because it is really too widely used tool and I heart it is compromised long time ago. | |
| Sep 26, 2020 at 19:00 | comment | added | William Martens | And, forgot to add, what do you mean by "standard means used by law enforcement agencies. I don't know that standard means, and also can never know for sure" And, also specifically what kind of attacks are you trying to avoid? Or be more resistant against? I would recommend using a already standard implementation of a good encryption system, instead of trying to invent your own crypto. Because it is a very very bad idea(to, alone try to invent encryption) +I read your above comment; Then you should really add the tag "covert", or if that's not what you're after; why not just use Tor? | |
| Sep 26, 2020 at 18:58 | comment | added | display_info | no need to hide the fact of communication itself, only the messages' content shall be hidden | |
| Sep 26, 2020 at 18:51 | comment | added | William Martens | You mean so that nobody can eavesdrop? Or know the communication is there at all? (Covert channels or communications?) Sorry , please clarify. | |
| Sep 26, 2020 at 18:49 | comment | added | display_info | I meant that no one can know these interception means used by law enforcement for sure | |
| Sep 26, 2020 at 18:43 | comment | added | William Martens | I read it; So it's not obfuscation or steganography you're after? and, " I don't know that standard means, but also cannot know of course." what do you exactly mean here, or is it maybe just me that is confused? If so, I'm sorry. | |
| Sep 26, 2020 at 18:27 | comment | added | display_info | Please read the edited version of my post | |
| Sep 26, 2020 at 18:16 | review | First posts | |||
| Sep 26, 2020 at 22:53 | |||||
| Sep 26, 2020 at 18:14 | history | edited | William Martens | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Fixed 2 spelling errors I made
|
| Sep 26, 2020 at 18:09 | history | answered | William Martens | CC BY-SA 4.0 |