Timeline for Can ISPs selectively block a page URL on a HTTPS website leaving its other page URLs alone?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 2021 at 4:07 | comment | added | Harper - Reinstate Monica | Is this why Wikipedia has gone to mandatory modern encryption (which breaks older platforms)? | |
| Jan 20, 2021 at 15:40 | answer | added | Gustavo Rodrigues | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jan 20, 2021 at 13:44 | comment | added | jcaron | @usr-local-ΕΨΗΕΛΩΝ There could be very valid reasons to block certain content, while not wanting to block the entire site. One wonders, though, what site would be important enough that they would not want to block it altogether, but would not accept legitimate requests for removal of specific content. To me, either the site is quite rogue, and it should not matter if it was completely blocked (it could lead them to revise their behaviour) or the reasons for removal are not legitimate enough to be universally recognised. | |
| Jan 20, 2021 at 12:06 | comment | added | usr-local-ΕΨΗΕΛΩΝ | On grounds of ethics, I would still refuse to cooperate with the OP to provide help/guidance in achieving what is expected from the question. | |
| Jan 18, 2021 at 14:31 | answer | added | jcaron | timeline score: 22 | |
| Jan 18, 2021 at 12:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackSecurity/status/1351137294732947457 | ||
| Jan 18, 2021 at 10:22 | history | became hot network question | |||
| Jan 18, 2021 at 8:56 | history | edited | Soufiane Tahiri | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 3 characters in body
|
| Jan 18, 2021 at 0:44 | comment | added | Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' | More generally: security.stackexchange.com/questions/4388/… | |
| Jan 18, 2021 at 0:12 | answer | added | ThoriumBR | timeline score: 51 | |
| Jan 18, 2021 at 0:08 | review | First posts | |||
| Jan 18, 2021 at 8:56 | |||||
| Jan 18, 2021 at 0:00 | history | asked | Desmond | CC BY-SA 4.0 |