Timeline for PRISM knew before the CFTC and SEC? Humans (maybe?) read already? [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 54 secs ago | comment | added | prosody-Gabe Vereable Context | @schroeder Please forgive me for asking then, but if it's not a tecnical/security/legal question, then what is it? Is it possibe my wording could be changed? | |
| 9 mins ago | comment | added | schroeder♦ | No, it's not your phrasing it's the content of the questions. And, no, you are not asking technical or even security questions, | |
| 10 mins ago | comment | added | prosody-Gabe Vereable Context | @schroeder I want a technical answer and it is a technical question, I come from a legal family that is how I sound all the time not just here. | |
| 11 mins ago | comment | added | schroeder♦ | Because that is ultimately a technical question and the answer is technical. You are asking broad, open-ended questions that are more about the legal aspects. | |
| 12 mins ago | comment | added | prosody-Gabe Vereable Context | @schroeder How is security.stackexchange.com/questions/155516/… allowed then? Is it my wording? | |
| 14 mins ago | comment | added | schroeder♦ | This is unanswerable on an information security site. It's open-ended, opinion-based, and more about the law than about security. This would be more ontopic on Law StackExchange, but I don't think it meets their requirements. | |
| 15 mins ago | history | closed | schroeder♦ | Not suitable for this site | |
| 16 mins ago | history | edited | prosody-Gabe Vereable Context | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Missing part.
|
| S 24 mins ago | review | First questions | |||
| 5 mins ago | |||||
| S 24 mins ago | history | asked | prosody-Gabe Vereable Context | CC BY-SA 4.0 |