Timeline for How to evaluate the strength of a hashing algorithm?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17, 2017 at 13:14 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://security.stackexchange.com/ with https://security.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Dec 27, 2012 at 14:18 | vote | accept | AnonEmployee | ||
| Dec 27, 2012 at 14:15 | history | edited | Polynomial | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Can't spell my name? Git!
|
| Dec 27, 2012 at 6:31 | comment | added | Lucas Kauffman | @Polynomial added it to the answer | |
| Dec 27, 2012 at 6:31 | history | edited | Lucas Kauffman | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 444 characters in body
|
| Dec 27, 2012 at 3:28 | comment | added | tylerl | I like how Dave has become a meme now. | |
| Dec 26, 2012 at 22:16 | comment | added | Polynomial | To clarify your last requirement: changing one single bit of input should change all output bits with a probability of 50%. Another requirement is that the hash is, to the highest extent possible, statistically independent of the input, e.g. a high hamming weight in the input does not produce an abnormal hamming weight in the output. | |
| Dec 26, 2012 at 21:45 | comment | added | Lucas Kauffman | I told myself to post one of the "oh you" meme's everytime someone posts a case of a homebrew crypto or crypto hash. Especially when it's bad. | |
| Dec 26, 2012 at 21:41 | comment | added | pdubs | We're doing image memes here now? | |
| Dec 26, 2012 at 21:38 | history | edited | Lucas Kauffman | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 355 characters in body
|
| Dec 26, 2012 at 21:33 | history | edited | Lucas Kauffman | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 355 characters in body
|
| Dec 26, 2012 at 21:19 | history | answered | Lucas Kauffman | CC BY-SA 3.0 |