Timeline for Is NAT66 increasing security?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2022 at 10:56 | vote | accept | Philip | ||
| Aug 16, 2022 at 8:21 | comment | added | Hennes | This has the same answer I wanted to post. NAT is not the same as security. To be secure one should not require NAT, one should require a firewall with proper rules. It is just that you need to set up some things in order to use NAT44 that means that you need some kind of firewall, but that does not make it safer 'because of NAt', it makes it safer 'because of firewall'. (and yes, I am aware of the downsides of not being able to reach IPs behind a NAT from the outside, but that also is not the solution to security, justr a nasty downside from NAT) | |
| S Aug 14, 2022 at 9:14 | review | First answers | |||
| Aug 14, 2022 at 11:11 | |||||
| S Aug 14, 2022 at 9:14 | history | answered | NiKiZe | CC BY-SA 4.0 |