Timeline for Is electronic signature a proper/sufficient mean for identification/authentication?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11 at 10:28 | vote | accept | ZygD | ||
| Jul 10 at 14:57 | comment | added | Gerard Ashton | If I were the requester, I wouldn't give any important ID number to your organization unless you could prove there was a good reason to do so and the method of submitting it was secure. | |
| Jul 10 at 11:43 | answer | added | Ljm Dullaart | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jul 10 at 9:27 | comment | added | mti2935 | Or, are you using the term 'electronic signature' to refer to a document signing solution (such as 'DocuSign'), which does not rely on certificates or crypto whatsoever? | |
| Jul 10 at 7:46 | comment | added | Steffen Ullrich | Electronically signed by what? By a self-issued certificate, by a government issued certificate or what else? The trust you can get from the signature depends (among other things) on the trust you have in the issuer of the certificate. | |
| Jul 10 at 5:25 | comment | added | security_paranoid | You want the truth? Most of the an electronic signature is probably sufficient but the reality is it’s really hard to tell if they don’t a national ID- they could be stubborn and lazy, or they could be an identity theft. | |
| Jul 10 at 4:51 | history | asked | ZygD | CC BY-SA 4.0 |