Timeline for When I use SSH tunneling, can I assume that the server does not need to be trusted?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 6 at 12:27 | comment | added | jcaron | Could you clarify with a small diagram of some sort: the 3 devices involved, and what devices connect to what other devices, and where the tunnels are? It seems to me that want you want is to be able to ssh into a server which is on a LAN behind a NAT, so you want to have that server ssh into a server on the public internet with a remote port forwarding? That is nearly equivalent to having port forwarding set up on your router/NAT device, really. | |
| Aug 5 at 1:21 | comment | added | Nacht | There is one malicious thing they can do, they can end your connection, or degrade it. Two. That's two malicious things | |
| Aug 4 at 15:59 | vote | accept | aaa | ||
| Aug 4 at 7:20 | history | became hot network question | |||
| Aug 4 at 5:21 | history | edited | Ja1024 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 12 characters in body; edited tags; edited title
|
| Aug 4 at 5:18 | comment | added | Ja1024 | I've replaced the term "reverse shell", because it's often associated with an attack technique. The more neutral term would be "SSH tunneling". | |
| Aug 4 at 5:14 | answer | added | Steffen Ullrich | timeline score: 18 | |
| Aug 4 at 5:08 | answer | added | Ja1024 | timeline score: 9 | |
| Aug 4 at 5:04 | history | edited | Steffen Ullrich | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited title
|
| Aug 3 at 23:45 | comment | added | Hman66 | I know this isn't your question, but why don't you want to trust third parties? They're called third parties for a reason... | |
| S Aug 3 at 23:18 | review | First questions | |||
| Aug 4 at 5:20 | |||||
| S Aug 3 at 23:18 | history | asked | aaa | CC BY-SA 4.0 |