Skip to main content
15 events
when toggle format what by license comment
S Feb 21, 2020 at 15:15 history suggested endolith CC BY-SA 4.0
Fixed grammar
Feb 21, 2020 at 15:08 review Suggested edits
S Feb 21, 2020 at 15:15
Mar 26, 2016 at 16:04 history edited dr jimbob CC BY-SA 3.0
added 209 characters in body
May 25, 2015 at 7:14 comment added Pacerier @LateralFractal, That's only true for houses with wires within the walls. If the wires are exposed all over the place, you could always hide somewhere and plug a wiretapper in.
May 25, 2015 at 7:11 comment added Pacerier @drjimbob, Regarding "if you went to 69.59.197.21 its stackexchange.com", Does IPSec solve the ip-leaking problem? Are there even ways to solve this problem?
Oct 5, 2013 at 5:33 comment added dr jimbob @LateralFractal - Agree that wireless is easier to eavesdrop than wired. However, in addition to governments, includes anyone upstream of your network connection can eavesdrop/alter your traffic. Including for example your ISP, or network administrators at your work, etc can intercept unencrypted wired traffic.
Oct 5, 2013 at 5:29 history edited dr jimbob CC BY-SA 3.0
added 85 characters in body
Oct 5, 2013 at 3:05 comment added LateralFractal Moral of the story is wireless traffic is easier to intercept than wired traffic. Unless your neighbour is an electrical engineer, spying on wired traffic is mostly the domain of governments.
Feb 4, 2013 at 22:43 vote accept user20378
Feb 4, 2013 at 21:53 history edited dr jimbob CC BY-SA 3.0
added 328 characters in body
Feb 4, 2013 at 21:49 comment added dr jimbob @user20378 - the attacker can write a simple script to capture your data and then forward it to some server they control.
Feb 4, 2013 at 21:48 history edited dr jimbob CC BY-SA 3.0
added 328 characters in body
Feb 4, 2013 at 21:47 comment added user20378 Great answer to part 1 but for part 2 what do mean by "either is trivial"?
Feb 4, 2013 at 21:46 vote accept user20378
Feb 4, 2013 at 21:47
Feb 4, 2013 at 21:42 history answered dr jimbob CC BY-SA 3.0