Timeline for With ASIC bitcoin miners, should SHA256 be considered insecure for password hashing?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17, 2017 at 10:46 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://security.stackexchange.com/ with https://security.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Apr 16, 2013 at 22:03 | comment | added | Anorov | @Earlz Many developers think that, but it is a pretty common misconception. It does not approach "good enough" even when looking at hardware from 3-5 years ago. It is better than md5, but not "good enough." | |
| Apr 15, 2013 at 17:34 | comment | added | user10211 | @Earlz Most programmers know nothing about security. | |
| Apr 15, 2013 at 17:33 | comment | added | Earlz | Well, it seems that it was always "good enough" when compared to md5 and is the default in many authentication setups | |
| Apr 15, 2013 at 17:32 | history | answered | user10211 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |