Timeline for Secure Development costs
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 14, 2015 at 16:14 | history | edited | Rory McCune | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
clean-up
|
| Jun 12, 2011 at 19:25 | vote | accept | Rory McCune | ||
| Jun 5, 2011 at 10:15 | comment | added | AviD♦ | Great question, I actually did some work around that a few years ago for a relatively large-ish multi-national dev shop - unfortunately, I don't have any of those nmbers anymore :(. Bottom line, as expected, it was not cheap, and only saved money in the long run because they were currently paying so much on the pentest-fix-retest-refix cycle.... | |
| Jun 5, 2011 at 10:13 | history | edited | AviD♦ |
edited tags
|
|
| May 26, 2011 at 15:37 | history | edited | Rory McCune | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added another reference to a building security in page
|
| May 26, 2011 at 14:25 | answer | added | atdre | timeline score: 10 | |
| May 26, 2011 at 14:24 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackSecurity/status/73756506222362625 | ||
| May 26, 2011 at 13:47 | comment | added | Rakkhi | I was going to point you to that study, one of the few I have seen quantifying secure at source. I did some analysis of here: rakkhis.com/2011/01/analysing-aberdeen-group-application.html | |
| May 26, 2011 at 13:29 | history | edited | Rory McCune | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added reference to informationweek article and Aberdeen group report
|
| May 26, 2011 at 13:10 | history | asked | Rory McCune | CC BY-SA 3.0 |