Timeline for Why is cross site scripting in URL dangerious if I don't use cookies? [duplicate]
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 3, 2018 at 12:05 | history | edited | Anders | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 character in body; edited tags; edited title
|
| Nov 13, 2013 at 10:44 | review | Reopen votes | |||
| Nov 13, 2013 at 13:38 | |||||
| S Nov 13, 2013 at 10:25 | history | suggested | Ebenezar John Paul | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Deleted Thanks in advance.
|
| Nov 13, 2013 at 9:54 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Nov 13, 2013 at 10:25 | |||||
| Nov 12, 2013 at 20:49 | history | closed | AviD♦ | Duplicate of What is the danger of Reflected Cross Site Scripting? | |
| Nov 12, 2013 at 20:49 | answer | added | Tobias | timeline score: 2 | |
| Nov 12, 2013 at 20:33 | review | Low quality posts | |||
| Nov 12, 2013 at 20:53 | |||||
| Nov 12, 2013 at 19:53 | review | First posts | |||
| Nov 12, 2013 at 20:07 | |||||
| Nov 12, 2013 at 19:47 | comment | added | paj28 | The URL looks like a login page, so I expect that site does use cookies. In general, if an attacker can get the victim to click a link they control, they can steal the cookies. This is an example of Reflective Cross-Site Scripting, and there's more information here: security.stackexchange.com/questions/19373/… | |
| Nov 12, 2013 at 19:42 | history | edited | that guy | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 96 characters in body; edited tags
|
| Nov 12, 2013 at 19:40 | history | edited | AviD♦ |
edited tags
|
|
| Nov 12, 2013 at 19:36 | history | asked | that guy | CC BY-SA 3.0 |