Timeline for What is a good rebuttal to users who wish all data WITHIN Db be encrypted?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 2016 at 21:33 | vote | accept | Mark | ||
| Feb 27, 2014 at 3:47 | answer | added | Anti-weakpasswords | timeline score: 2 | |
| Feb 26, 2014 at 15:41 | answer | added | Colin Cassidy | timeline score: 4 | |
| Feb 26, 2014 at 15:24 | answer | added | Jonathan Giddy | timeline score: 0 | |
| Feb 26, 2014 at 13:28 | review | First posts | |||
| Feb 26, 2014 at 14:06 | |||||
| Feb 26, 2014 at 13:27 | comment | added | Mark | My hopes in posting here were that others have had a similar experience and were able to prove that it is indeed the wrong route to go, and in return could provide me with their solutions or recommendations! | |
| Feb 26, 2014 at 13:25 | comment | added | Mark | I'm not familiar with that, so let me explain what I can to perhaps guide your question towards an answer. The Database is created and mapped by a DBA / Data Architect. It is then put out on a shared server BY them, for me to utilize in my development. | |
| Feb 26, 2014 at 13:25 | comment | added | Philipp | I think this would be more fitting for workplace.stackexchange.com as a general "How to explain to the management that a nonsensical technical requirement makes the project impossible" question. | |
| Feb 26, 2014 at 13:22 | comment | added | Philipp | Could you fulfill the policy by running the database on an encrypted filesystem? | |
| Feb 26, 2014 at 13:20 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackSecurity/status/438664955932717056 | ||
| Feb 26, 2014 at 13:09 | history | asked | Mark | CC BY-SA 3.0 |